Kosinski Mark, Kujawski Sara C, Martin Richard, Wanke Lee A, Buatti Mary C, Ware John E, Perfetto Eleanor M
QualityMetric, Inc, Lincoln, RI 02865, USA.
Am J Manag Care. 2002 Mar;8(3):231-40.
To document the burden of early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on health-related quality of life (HQL) and compare changes in HQL across 2 treatments.
Analysis of HQL scores among patients enrolled in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized control trial of early RA treatment.
A total of 424 patients with early RA were randomized to 1 of 2 treatment groups: etanercept or methotrexate. Patients were treated and followed for 52 weeks. Health-related quality of life was assessed before and throughout treatment using the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) and the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). The HQL burden of RA was established by comparing SF-36 scale scores to general US population norms. The impact of treatment on HQL was determined by comparing scores on both SF-36 and HAQ scales.
Before treatment, RA patients showed significant decrements in scores on all SF-36 scales and summary measures in comparison with age- and sex-matched general US population norms, multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) F(8,2815) = 204.6, P < .0001. After 52 weeks of treatment, 7 of 8 SF-36 scales and the physical summary measure remained significantly below the general US population norm, MANOVA F(8,2815) = 41.9, P < .0001. Patients randomized to etanercept showed significantly better HQL improvement earlier in treatment than patients randomized to methotrexate on the SF-36 physical summary, MANOVA F(10,4230) = 6.1, P< .0001, the SF-36 arthritis-specific health index, MANOVA F(10,4230) = 8.5, P < .0001, and the HAQ, MANOVA F(10,4230) = 14.7, P < .0001. At 52 weeks, there were no significant differences between treatment groups.
Rheumatoid arthritis places tremendous disease burden on patients' HQL. Successful treatment of early RA improved HQL. Etanercept showed a rapid HQL response.
记录早期类风湿关节炎(RA)对健康相关生活质量(HQL)的负担,并比较两种治疗方法下HQL的变化。
对参加早期RA治疗多中心、双盲、随机对照试验的患者的HQL评分进行分析。
总共424例早期RA患者被随机分为两个治疗组之一:依那西普或甲氨蝶呤。对患者进行52周的治疗和随访。在治疗前及整个治疗过程中,使用医学结局研究简明健康调查(SF - 36)和健康评估问卷(HAQ)评估健康相关生活质量。通过将SF - 36量表评分与美国普通人群规范进行比较,确定RA的HQL负担。通过比较SF - 36和HAQ量表的评分,确定治疗对HQL的影响。
治疗前,与年龄和性别匹配的美国普通人群规范相比,RA患者在所有SF - 36量表和综合测量指标上的得分均显著降低,多变量方差分析(MANOVA)F(8,2815) = 204.6,P <.0001。治疗52周后,8个SF - 36量表中的7个以及身体综合测量指标仍显著低于美国普通人群规范,MANOVA F(8,2815) = 41.9,P <.0001。在SF - 36身体综合测量指标上,随机接受依那西普治疗的患者在治疗早期的HQL改善情况显著优于随机接受甲氨蝶呤治疗的患者,MANOVA F(10,4230) = 6.1,P<.0001;在SF - 36关节炎特异性健康指数上,MANOVA F(10,4230) = 8.5,P <.0001;在HAQ上,MANOVA F(10,4230) = 14.7,P <.0001。在52周时,治疗组之间无显著差异。
类风湿关节炎给患者的HQL带来巨大疾病负担。早期RA的成功治疗可改善HQL。依那西普显示出快速的HQL反应。