Piironen Timo, Haese Alexander, Huland Hartwig, Steuber Thomas, Christensen Ib Jarle, Brünner Nils, Danø Keld, Høyer-Hansen Gunilla, Lilja Hans
The Finsen Laboratory, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Clin Chem. 2006 May;52(5):838-44. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2005.064253. Epub 2006 Mar 16.
Early detection of prostate cancer (PCa) centers on measurements of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), but current testing practices suffer from lack of specificity and generate many unnecessary prostate biopsies. Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) is present in blood in both intact and cleaved forms. Increased uPAR in blood is correlated with poor prognosis in various cancers, but uPAR has not been shown to be useful in PCa diagnostics. We assessed the ability of immunoassays for specific uPAR forms to discriminate PCa from benign conditions.
We measured total PSA (tPSA), free PSA (fPSA), intact uPAR [uPAR(I-III)], intact uPAR + cleaved uPAR domains II+III [uPAR(I-III) + uPAR(II-III)], and cleaved uPAR domain I [uPAR(I)] in sera from 224 men with and 166 men without PCa. We assessed differences in serum concentrations between the PCa and noncancer groups within the entire cohort and in men with tPSA concentrations of 2-10 microg/L. The diagnostic accuracy of individual analytes and analyte combinations was explored by logistic regression and ROC analyses and evaluations of sensitivity and specificity pairs.
Serum uPAR(I) and uPAR(II-III) were higher in PCa than in benign disease. In men with tPSA between 2 and 10 microg/L, the combination of %fPSA with the ratio uPAR(I)/uPAR(I-III) had a greater area under the ROC curve (0.73) than did %fPSA (0.68).
Specific measurements of different uPAR forms in serum improve the specificity of PCa detection. The uPAR forms may therefore be complementary to PSA for PCa detection, most importantly in men with moderately increased PSA.
前列腺癌(PCa)的早期检测主要基于前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)的检测,但目前的检测方法缺乏特异性,导致许多不必要的前列腺活检。可溶性尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活物受体(uPAR)以完整形式和裂解形式存在于血液中。血液中uPAR水平升高与多种癌症的不良预后相关,但uPAR在PCa诊断中的作用尚未得到证实。我们评估了针对特定uPAR形式的免疫测定在区分PCa与良性疾病方面的能力。
我们测量了224例患有PCa的男性和166例未患PCa的男性血清中的总PSA(tPSA)、游离PSA(fPSA)、完整uPAR[uPAR(I-III)]、完整uPAR+裂解的uPAR结构域II+III[uPAR(I-III)+uPAR(II-III)]以及裂解的uPAR结构域I[uPAR(I)]。我们评估了整个队列中PCa组和非癌症组之间以及tPSA浓度为2-10μg/L的男性血清浓度的差异。通过逻辑回归、ROC分析以及敏感性和特异性对的评估,探讨了个体分析物和分析物组合的诊断准确性。
PCa患者血清中的uPAR(I)和uPAR(II-III)高于良性疾病患者。在tPSA为2至10μg/L的男性中,%fPSA与uPAR(I)/uPAR(I-III)比值的组合在ROC曲线下的面积(0.73)大于%fPSA(0.68)。
血清中不同uPAR形式的特异性测量提高了PCa检测的特异性。因此,uPAR形式可能是PSA检测PCa的补充,最重要的是在PSA中度升高的男性中。