• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[外科培训与腹股沟疝修补术]

[Surgical training and inguinal hernia repair].

作者信息

Cueto Rozon R, De Baerdemacker Y, Polliand C, Champault G

机构信息

Service de chirurgie digestive, CHU Jean-Verdier, université Paris-XIII, UFR de Bobigny, avenue du 14-Juillet, 93140 Bondy, France.

出版信息

Ann Chir. 2006 May;131(5):311-5. doi: 10.1016/j.anchir.2006.02.003. Epub 2006 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.anchir.2006.02.003
PMID:16546112
Abstract

AIMS

To evaluate influence of surgical experience on inguinal hernia repair.

PATIENTS

From 1997 to 2003, 380 patients (mean age 55 years old) with primary unilateral inguinal hernia were treated by Lichtenstein technique.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, surgeons were classified in three groups: group 1: hernia repair was performed by an experimented surgeon (consultant or senior registrar) and a young surgical trainee (resident) (161 cases); group 2: surgery was performed by a junior surgeon (resident) under the control of an experimented surgeon (135 cases) and in the group 3 (84 cases), Lichtenstein technique was performed by two residents, alone, supervised by an experimented surgeon, in the operative room. Evaluation criterion were operative time, hospital stay, morbidity, time to return to normal and professional activities, recurrences and chronic pain with a follow up of, at least, 2 years.

RESULTS

The three groups were comparable in term of socio economic data, hernia and follow up. The only significant (P=0.01) difference concern operative time which increased from 20% for group 2 and 3 (residents) compared to the group 1. There was also no difference between junior and senior resident.

CONCLUSION

Lichtenstein hernia repair should be performed by young surgeon in training alone in condition of precise teaching organization and experimented surgeon supervision. For patient, in this condition, there is no trouble in term of surgical results.

摘要

目的

评估手术经验对腹股沟疝修补术的影响。

患者

1997年至2003年,380例(平均年龄55岁)原发性单侧腹股沟疝患者接受了利希滕斯坦技术治疗。

方法

在这项回顾性研究中,外科医生被分为三组:第一组:由经验丰富的外科医生(顾问或高级住院医师)和年轻的外科实习生(住院医师)进行疝修补术(161例);第二组:由初级外科医生(住院医师)在经验丰富的外科医生指导下进行手术(135例);第三组(84例),由两名住院医师在经验丰富的外科医生在手术室监督下单独进行利希滕斯坦技术。评估标准为手术时间、住院时间、发病率、恢复正常和专业活动的时间、复发率以及慢性疼痛,随访至少2年。

结果

三组在社会经济数据、疝和随访方面具有可比性。唯一显著(P = 0.01)的差异在于手术时间,与第一组相比,第二组和第三组(住院医师)的手术时间增加了20%。初级和高级住院医师之间也没有差异。

结论

在精确的教学组织和经验丰富的外科医生监督的条件下,年轻的实习外科医生应单独进行利希滕斯坦疝修补术。对于患者来说,在这种情况下,手术结果没有问题。

相似文献

1
[Surgical training and inguinal hernia repair].[外科培训与腹股沟疝修补术]
Ann Chir. 2006 May;131(5):311-5. doi: 10.1016/j.anchir.2006.02.003. Epub 2006 Mar 6.
2
[Comparison between two methods of inguinal hernia surgery--Lichtenstein and Desarda].两种腹股沟疝手术方法的比较——利chtenstein法与德萨尔达法
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2008 May;24(143):392-5.
3
Early results of inguinal hernia repair by the 'mesh plug' technique--first 200 cases.“网塞”技术修补腹股沟疝的早期结果——首批200例病例
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2000 Nov;82(6):396-400.
4
Improved outcomes with the Prolene Hernia System mesh compared with the time-honored Lichtenstein onlay mesh repair for inguinal hernia repair.与历史悠久的Lichtenstein修补术使用的平片修补腹股沟疝相比,使用普理灵疝修补系统补片的治疗效果更佳。
Am J Surg. 2007 Jun;193(6):697-701. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.08.087.
5
Comparison of Shouldice and Lichtenstein repair for treatment of primary inguinal hernia.Shouldice法与Lichtenstein修补术治疗原发性腹股沟疝的比较。
Acta Chir Belg. 2004 Aug;104(4):418-21.
6
Randomized trial comparing the Prolene Hernia System, mesh plug repair and Lichtenstein method for open inguinal hernia repair.比较普理灵疝修补系统、疝环充填式无张力疝修补术及李金斯坦法开放腹股沟疝修补术的随机试验
Br J Surg. 2005 Jan;92(1):33-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4702.
7
[Valenti method (PAD) as an assesment of polypropylene mesh fixing standarization in inguinal hernia repair].[瓦伦蒂方法(PAD)用于评估腹股沟疝修补术中聚丙烯网片固定的标准化]
Folia Med Cracov. 2008;49(1-2):3-9.
8
Randomised study of Lichtenstein compared with Shouldice inguinal hernia repair by surgeons in training.实习外科医生对利chtenstein手术与Shouldice腹股沟疝修补术进行的随机研究。
Eur J Surg. 1999 Jan;165(1):49-53. doi: 10.1080/110241599750007504.
9
[Teaching in the operative room: the benefit of daysurgery on surgical trainees].
G Chir. 2008 Nov-Dec;29(11-12):511-4.
10
Single surgeon experience with bilayer polypropylene mesh repair of inguinal hernia.单名外科医生采用双层聚丙烯补片修补腹股沟疝的经验
ANZ J Surg. 2004 May;74(5):343-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-1433.2004.02989.x.

引用本文的文献

1
International guidelines for groin hernia management.腹股沟疝治疗的国际指南。
Hernia. 2018 Feb;22(1):1-165. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
2
Is there a role for hernia subspecialists? Or is this a step too far?疝专科医生能发挥作用吗?还是说这一步走得太远了?
Hernia. 2016 Oct;20(5):637-40. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1511-9. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
3
The role of surgical expertise with regard to chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) after Lichtenstein correction of inguinal hernia: a systematic review.
腹股沟疝Lichtenstein修补术后慢性术后腹股沟疼痛(CPIP)方面手术专业知识的作用:一项系统评价
Hernia. 2016 Jun;20(3):349-56. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1483-9. Epub 2016 Apr 5.
4
Effect of mesh type, surgeon and selected patients' characteristics on the treatment of inguinal hernia with the Lichtenstein technique. Randomized trial.补片类型、外科医生及选定患者特征对Lichtenstein技术治疗腹股沟疝的影响。随机试验。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2013 Jun;8(2):99-106. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2011.32824. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
5
Ten-year audit of Lichtenstein hernioplasty under local anaesthesia performed by surgical residents.外科住院医师在局部麻醉下进行李金斯坦疝修补术的十年审计
BMC Surg. 2010 Aug 4;10:24. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-10-24.
6
European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients.欧洲疝学会关于成人腹股沟疝治疗的指南。
Hernia. 2009 Aug;13(4):343-403. doi: 10.1007/s10029-009-0529-7. Epub 2009 Jul 28.