Dimeski G, Barnett R J
Department of Chemical Pathology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Queensland.
Crit Care Resusc. 2005 Mar;7(1):12-5.
Ion selective electrodes (ISE) measure electrolytes by two different technologies, direct and indirect. We wished to investigate the effect of total plasma protein concentration on the plasma sodium, potassium and chloride measurements by indirect ISE compared with measurements by direct ISE.
The evaluation of the objective was performed in a tertiary care hospital on patient blood samples sent to the pathology laboratory for general chemistry analysis. To determine the degree of difference between the two ISE measurements, 195 lithium heparin plasma samples were measured and the results were separated into three groups (65 samples in each group) depending on the protein concentration (e.g. total plasma protein concentration less than, greater than and within the reference range between 62-83 g/L). The samples were analysed over a 40 day period on a Hitachi Modular ISE system - indirect ISE (Roche Australia) and Bayer Rapidlab 865 Blood Gas Analyser - direct ISE (Bayer Diagnostics, Australia).
Using indirect ISE, low plasma protein concentrations caused a 'pseudohyper' effect in all 3 analytes and a 'pseudohypo' effect with high plasma protein concentrations. The variation in total protein concentration had the greatest effect on plasma sodium measurement. The relationship was non-linear and no accurate predictive value could be calculated for the plasma electrolytes with changes in plasma protein concentrations.
The plasma sodium, potassium and chloride measurements are effected by changes in plasma protein concentration when measured by indirect ISE systems. Clinicians must be aware that differences exist between the ISE technologies and in border-line clinical situations, the direct ISE systems provide a more accurate estimate of plasma sodium, potassium, chloride, anion gap, osmolality and strong ion difference calculations, and should be used for clinical decision-making.
离子选择性电极(ISE)通过两种不同技术测量电解质,即直接法和间接法。我们希望研究与直接ISE测量相比,总血浆蛋白浓度对间接ISE测量血浆钠、钾和氯的影响。
在一家三级护理医院对送往病理实验室进行常规化学分析的患者血样进行了该目的评估。为了确定两种ISE测量之间的差异程度,对195份肝素锂血浆样本进行了测量,并根据蛋白浓度(例如总血浆蛋白浓度低于、高于以及在62 - 83 g/L的参考范围内)将结果分为三组(每组65个样本)。在40天的时间内,使用日立模块化ISE系统(间接ISE,澳大利亚罗氏公司)和拜耳Rapidlab 865血气分析仪(直接ISE,澳大利亚拜耳诊断公司)对样本进行分析。
使用间接ISE时,低血浆蛋白浓度在所有三种分析物中均引起“假性高值”效应,高血浆蛋白浓度则引起“假性低值”效应。总蛋白浓度的变化对血浆钠测量影响最大。这种关系是非线性的,并且无法根据血浆蛋白浓度的变化为血浆电解质计算出准确的预测值。
使用间接ISE系统测量时,血浆钠、钾和氯的测量会受到血浆蛋白浓度变化的影响。临床医生必须意识到ISE技术之间存在差异,在临界临床情况下,直接ISE系统能更准确地估计血浆钠、钾、氯、阴离子间隙、渗透压和强离子差计算结果,应用于临床决策。