• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

蛋白质和脂质干扰导致直接和间接离子选择性电极测量电解质时出现差异。

Discrepancies in Electrolyte Measurements by Direct and Indirect Ion Selective Electrodes due to Interferences by Proteins and Lipids.

作者信息

Chopra Parul, Datta Sudip Kumar

机构信息

Department of Hematology and Immunology, Dr. Lal PathLabs, New Delhi, India.

Department of Laboratory Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

J Lab Physicians. 2020 Aug;12(2):84-91. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1713690. Epub 2020 Jun 11.

DOI:10.1055/s-0040-1713690
PMID:32905238
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7467836/
Abstract

We aim to report the simultaneous effect of different protein and lipid concentrations on sodium (Na ) and potassium (K ) measurement by direct and indirect ion selective electrodes (dISE and iISE) in patient samples.  Na and K were measured in 195 serum samples received in the laboratory using iISE by Roche Modular P800 autoanalyzer and using dISE by XI-921 ver. 6.0 Caretium electrolyte analyzer. Serum total protein (TP), cholesterol (Chol), and triglycerides (TG) were measured using conventional photometric methods on Roche Modular P800 autoanalyzer. Differences for each pair of results for Na (Diff_Na = [Na Na ]) and K (Diff_K = [K K ]) were calculated. Patient subgroups with high, normal, or low TP (< 5, 5-7.9, or ≥ 8 g/dL), Chol (< 150, 150-299, or ≥300 mg/dL), or TG (< 150, 150-299, or ≥300 mg/dL) were compared using analysis of variance. Note that 95% confidence interval of Diff_Na and Diff_K were calculated to see the number of samples showing clinically significant differences.  Diff_Na ( = 0.007) and Diff_K ( = 0.002) were found significant between samples with normal and high TP. However, effect of TG was not significant. Chol concentration affected Diff_Na significantly between low versus normal ( = 0.002), and high versus normal ( = 0.031) Chol groups. Diff_K was significant ( = 0.009) between low versus normal Chol. Clinically relevant disagreement of ≥|5| mmol/L for Na was observed in high percentage of samples including all subcategories; however, for K only 3.6% of the total samples showed disagreement of ≥ |0.5| mmol/L. A multivariate regression equation based on fit regression model was also derived.  Summarily, interchangeable use of electrolyte results from dISE and iISE is not advisable, especially in a setting of hyperproteinemia (≥8 g/dL) or hypercholesterolemia (≥300 mg/dL); more so for Na .

摘要

我们旨在报告不同蛋白质和脂质浓度对患者样本中钠(Na⁺)和钾(K⁺)通过直接和间接离子选择电极(dISE和iISE)测量的同时影响。使用罗氏Modular P800自动分析仪的iISE和Caretium电解质分析仪XI - 921版本6.0的dISE对实验室收到的195份血清样本中的Na⁺和K⁺进行测量。使用罗氏Modular P800自动分析仪上的传统光度法测量血清总蛋白(TP)、胆固醇(Chol)和甘油三酯(TG)。计算每对Na⁺(Diff_Na⁺ = [Na⁺dISE - Na⁺iISE])和K⁺(Diff_K⁺ = [K⁺dISE - K⁺iISE])结果的差异。使用方差分析比较TP(<5、5 - 7.9或≥8 g/dL)、Chol(<150、150 - 299或≥300 mg/dL)或TG(<150、150 - 299或≥300 mg/dL)高、正常或低的患者亚组。计算Diff_Na⁺和Diff_K⁺的95%置信区间,以查看显示临床显著差异的样本数量。在正常和高TP的样本之间发现Diff_Na⁺(P = 0.007)和Diff_K⁺(P = 0.002)有显著差异。然而,TG的影响不显著。Chol浓度在低与正常(P = 0.002)以及高与正常(P = 0.031)Chol组之间对Diff_Na⁺有显著影响。Diff_K⁺在低与正常Chol之间有显著差异(P = 0.009)。在包括所有子类别的高比例样本中观察到Na⁺的临床相关差异≥|5| mmol/L;然而,对于K⁺,仅3.6%的总样本显示差异≥|0.5| mmol/L。还推导了基于拟合回归模型的多元回归方程。总之,不建议互换使用dISE和iISE的电解质结果,特别是在高蛋白血症(≥8 g/dL)或高胆固醇血症(≥300 mg/dL)的情况下;对于Na⁺更是如此。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf17/7467836/70c9f632fd69/10-1055-s-0040-1713690_00076_03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf17/7467836/c1bd2e934139/10-1055-s-0040-1713690_00076_01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf17/7467836/9cf6a97b5525/10-1055-s-0040-1713690_00076_02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf17/7467836/70c9f632fd69/10-1055-s-0040-1713690_00076_03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf17/7467836/c1bd2e934139/10-1055-s-0040-1713690_00076_01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf17/7467836/9cf6a97b5525/10-1055-s-0040-1713690_00076_02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf17/7467836/70c9f632fd69/10-1055-s-0040-1713690_00076_03.jpg

相似文献

1
Discrepancies in Electrolyte Measurements by Direct and Indirect Ion Selective Electrodes due to Interferences by Proteins and Lipids.蛋白质和脂质干扰导致直接和间接离子选择性电极测量电解质时出现差异。
J Lab Physicians. 2020 Aug;12(2):84-91. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1713690. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
2
Paraproteins and electrolyte assays: exclusion effect and effect of paraprotein elimination.副蛋白和电解质检测:排除效应和副蛋白消除的影响。
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2023 Jul;83(4):212-218. doi: 10.1080/00365513.2023.2204401. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
3
Interference in Ion-Selective Electrodes Due to Proteins and Lipids.蛋白质和脂质对离子选择性电极的干扰。
J Appl Lab Med. 2022 Mar 2;7(2):589-595. doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfab125.
4
Prevalence of Clinically Significant Differences in Sodium Measurements Due to Abnormal Protein Concentrations Using an Indirect Ion-Selective Electrode Method.使用间接离子选择电极法时,因蛋白质浓度异常导致钠测量值出现具有临床意义差异的患病率。
J Appl Lab Med. 2019 Nov;4(3):427-432. doi: 10.1373/jalm.2018.028720. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
5
Effect of Hypoproteinemia on Electrolyte Measurement by Direct and Indirect Ion Selective Electrode Methods.低蛋白血症对直接和间接离子选择电极法测定电解质的影响。
J Lab Physicians. 2021 Jun;13(2):144-147. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1730821. Epub 2021 Jun 19.
6
Increasing Glucose Concentrations Interfere with Estimation of Electrolytes by Indirect Ion Selective Electrode Method.葡萄糖浓度升高会干扰间接离子选择电极法对电解质的测定。
Indian J Clin Biochem. 2016 Apr;31(2):224-230. doi: 10.1007/s12291-015-0522-0. Epub 2015 Sep 12.
7
Effect of moderate hypercholesterolemia on recognition of hypernatremia using indirect measurements of serum sodium and potassium concentrations.中度高胆固醇血症对使用血清钠和钾浓度间接测量法识别高钠血症的影响。
Clin Lab. 2007;53(7-8):441-7.
8
Reference Intervals of Serum Sodium, Potassium, and Chlorine in Chinese Han Population and Comparison of Two ISE Methods.中国汉族人群血清钠、钾、氯参考区间及两种离子选择电极法的比较
J Clin Lab Anal. 2015 May;29(3):226-34. doi: 10.1002/jcla.21755. Epub 2014 May 5.
9
Are sodium and potassium results on arterial blood gas analyzer equivalent to those on electrolyte analyzer?动脉血气分析仪上的钠和钾检测结果与电解质分析仪上的结果相同吗?
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2016 Apr;20(4):233-7. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.180044.
10
Plasma sodium measurements by direct ion selective methods in laboratory and point of care may not be clinically interchangeable.在实验室和即时检测中,通过直接离子选择法测量血浆钠的结果在临床上可能无法互换。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2017 Oct;31(5):1103-1109. doi: 10.1007/s10877-016-9938-1. Epub 2016 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Hyponatremia with an Osmolar Gap, Pseudohyponatremia or Hyper-Osmolar Hyponatremia?伴有渗透压间隙的低钠血症、假性低钠血症还是高渗性低钠血症?
Am J Med Open. 2024 Dec 7;13:100081. doi: 10.1016/j.ajmo.2024.100081. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Unmeasured Osmoles: The Hidden Solutes Obscuring a Hyponatremia Evaluation.未测定的渗透摩尔:隐匿性溶质掩盖低钠血症评估
Cureus. 2024 Aug 14;16(8):e66833. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66833. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Comparison of lipemia interference created with native lipemic material and intravenous lipid emulsion in emergency laboratory tests.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of serum sodium levels measured by blood gas analyzer and biochemistry autoanalyzer in patients with hyponatremia, eunatremia, and hypernatremia.血气分析仪和生化自动分析仪测定低钠血症、血钠正常和高钠血症患者血清钠水平的比较。
Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Aug;34(8):1473-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.04.037. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
2
Understanding Bland Altman analysis.理解布兰德-奥特曼分析。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2015 Jun 5;25(2):141-51. doi: 10.11613/BM.2015.015. eCollection 2015.
3
Analysis of bias in measurements of potassium, sodium and hemoglobin by an emergency department-based blood gas analyzer relative to hospital laboratory autoanalyzer results.
比较内源性脂血标本和静脉用脂肪乳剂对急诊检验项目的脂血干扰。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2024 Jun 15;34(2):020701. doi: 10.11613/BM.2024.020701. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
4
Pseudohyponatremia Secondary to Hypercholesterolemia in the Setting of Intrahepatic Cholestasis due to Metastatic Liver Disease: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.肝转移瘤致肝内胆汁淤积症相关假性低钠血症伴高胆固醇血症:病例报告及文献复习
Acta Med Acad. 2022 Aug;51(2):128-131. doi: 10.5644/ama2006-124.381.
5
Agreement of Potassium, Sodium, Glucose, and Hemoglobin Measured by Blood Gas Analyzer With Dry Chemistry Analyzer and Complete Blood Count Analyzer: A Two-Center Retrospective Analysis.血气分析仪与干式化学分析仪及全血细胞计数分析仪测定钾、钠、葡萄糖和血红蛋白的一致性:一项两中心回顾性分析。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Apr 1;9:799642. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.799642. eCollection 2022.
基于急诊科的血气分析仪对钾、钠和血红蛋白的测量结果相对于医院实验室自动分析仪结果的偏差分析。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 7;10(4):e0122383. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122383. eCollection 2015.
4
Pseudohyponatremia: does it matter in current clinical practice?假性低钠血症:在当前临床实践中重要吗?
Electrolyte Blood Press. 2006 Nov;4(2):77-82. doi: 10.5049/EBP.2006.4.2.77.
5
Use of a blood gas analyzer and a laboratory autoanalyzer in routine practice to measure electrolytes in intensive care unit patients.在常规实践中使用血气分析仪和实验室自动分析仪测量重症监护病房患者的电解质。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2012 Aug 3;12:17. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-12-17.
6
Disagreement between ion selective electrode direct and indirect sodium measurements: estimation of the problem in a tertiary referral hospital.离子选择性电极直接法与间接法测量钠离子的差异:三级转诊医院的问题评估。
J Crit Care. 2012 Jun;27(3):326.e9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.11.003. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
7
Pseudohyponatremia revisited: a modern-day pitfall.重新审视假性低钠血症:一种现代陷阱。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011 Apr;135(4):516-9. doi: 10.5858/2010-0018-RS.1.
8
Comparison of the point-of-care blood gas analyzer versus the laboratory auto-analyzer for the measurement of electrolytes.即时检验血气分析仪与实验室自动分析仪在电解质测量方面的比较。
Int J Emerg Med. 2009 Feb 24;2(2):117-20. doi: 10.1007/s12245-009-0091-1.
9
Critical difference calculations revised: inclusion of variation in standard deviation with analyte concentration.临界差值计算修订版:包含分析物浓度变化的标准差。
Ann Clin Biochem. 2009 Nov;46(Pt 6):517-9. doi: 10.1258/acb.2009.009083. Epub 2009 Oct 16.
10
Effect of low serum total protein on sodium and potassium measurement by ion-selective electrodes in critically ill patients.低血清总蛋白对危重症患者离子选择电极法测定钠和钾的影响
Br J Biomed Sci. 2008;65(3):128-31. doi: 10.1080/09674845.2008.11732815.