• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的使用时长:对耐受性的影响

Duration of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition: implications for tolerability.

作者信息

Murray N H

机构信息

Medical Research Department, ICI Pharmaceuticals, Macclesfield, UK.

出版信息

Cardiology. 1991;79 Suppl 1:22-9. doi: 10.1159/000174903.

DOI:10.1159/000174903
PMID:1655262
Abstract

A large co-ordinated multinational clinical-trial programme in hypertension has provided comparative data on adverse events in patients on lisinopril (n = 318) compared with enalapril (n = 321) and in 230 patients on lisinopril versus captopril (n = 235). The three groups were demographically well matched with regard to age and duration of treatment. However, in comparison with the lisinopril group, the captopril-treated group had a slightly higher proportion of males (NS). The incidence of adverse events on lisinopril was similar to that on enalapril (10.4 vs. 8.7%, NS) and captopril (11.7 vs. 11.9%, NS). The incidence of withdrawals was similar on lisinopril and enalapril (1.9 vs. 1.9%, NS) and captopril (4.8 vs. 3.0%, NS). The most frequently reported events affected the digestive, respiratory, or nervous and psychiatric systems of the body. The pattern of events and withdrawals was similar for all three drugs. The incidence of laboratory changes for lisinopril versus enalapril and lisinopril versus captopril was similar. The safety profiles of all three drugs were comparable in young and elderly patients. First-dose hypotension was reported for 2 of 548 patients on lisinopril, and renal failure was reported for 3 of 286 patients on enalapril. Overall, the events reflected the class-specific effects previously identified for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. The data indicate that long-acting angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors do not impose any additional side-effect risk in hypertension.

摘要

一项大规模的高血压多中心协调临床试验项目提供了比较数据,涉及赖诺普利组(n = 318)与依那普利组(n = 321)的不良事件,以及230例使用赖诺普利的患者与235例使用卡托普利的患者的不良事件。这三组在年龄和治疗时长方面在人口统计学上匹配良好。然而,与赖诺普利组相比,卡托普利治疗组男性比例略高(无统计学意义)。赖诺普利的不良事件发生率与依那普利相似(10.4%对8.7%,无统计学意义),与卡托普利也相似(11.7%对11.9%,无统计学意义)。停药发生率在赖诺普利和依那普利之间相似(1.9%对1.9%,无统计学意义),与卡托普利相比也相似(4.8%对3.0%,无统计学意义)。最常报告的事件影响身体的消化、呼吸或神经及精神系统。三种药物的事件和停药模式相似。赖诺普利与依那普利以及赖诺普利与卡托普利的实验室检查变化发生率相似。所有三种药物在年轻和老年患者中的安全性概况相当。赖诺普利治疗的548例患者中有2例报告了首剂低血压,依那普利治疗的286例患者中有3例报告了肾衰竭。总体而言,这些事件反映了先前确定的血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂类特异性效应。数据表明,长效血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂在高血压治疗中不会带来任何额外的副作用风险。

相似文献

1
Duration of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition: implications for tolerability.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的使用时长:对耐受性的影响
Cardiology. 1991;79 Suppl 1:22-9. doi: 10.1159/000174903.
2
Lisinopril and captopril in the treatment of heart failure in older patients. Comparison of a long- and short-acting angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor.赖诺普利和卡托普利治疗老年患者心力衰竭。长效与短效血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的比较。
Am J Med. 1988 Sep 23;85(3B):44-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(88)90350-6.
3
ACE inhibitors in mild to moderate hypertension: comparison of lisinopril and captopril administered once daily. French Cooperative Study Group.轻度至中度高血压患者使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂:赖诺普利与卡托普利每日一次给药的比较。法国合作研究小组
J Hum Hypertens. 1989 Jun;3 Suppl 1:23-8.
4
Short- and long-acting angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: a randomized trial of lisinopril versus captopril in the treatment of congestive heart failure. The Multicenter Lisinopril-Captopril Congestive Heart Failure Study Group.短效和长效血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂:赖诺普利与卡托普利治疗充血性心力衰竭的随机试验。多中心赖诺普利-卡托普利充血性心力衰竭研究组。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989 May;13(6):1240-7. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(89)90294-5.
5
Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. Disparities in the mechanism of their antihypertensive effect.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂。其降压作用机制的差异。
Am J Hypertens. 1988 Jul;1(3 Pt 3):214S-216S. doi: 10.1093/ajh/1.3.214s.
6
Safety and tolerability of lisinopril in older hypertensive patients.赖诺普利在老年高血压患者中的安全性和耐受性。
Am J Med. 1988 Sep 23;85(3B):55-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(88)90352-x.
7
Clinical experience with lisinopril. Observations on safety and tolerability.
J Hum Hypertens. 1989 Jun;3 Suppl 1:177-86.
8
Controlling hypertension: lisinopril-hydrochlorothiazide vs captopril-hydrochlorothiazide. An Italian multicentre study.控制高血压:赖诺普利-氢氯噻嗪与卡托普利-氢氯噻嗪对比。一项意大利多中心研究。
J Hum Hypertens. 1991 Dec;5 Suppl 2:55-7; discussion 57-8.
9
Lisinopril in the treatment of congestive heart failure.赖诺普利治疗充血性心力衰竭
J Hum Hypertens. 1989 Jun;3 Suppl 1:83-7.
10
Efficacy and safety of lisinopril in older patients with essential hypertension.赖诺普利治疗老年原发性高血压患者的疗效与安全性。
Am J Med. 1988 Sep 23;85(3B):35-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(88)90348-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Reference-based pricing of prescription drugs: exploring the equivalence of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors.处方药的参考定价:探索血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的等效性。
CMAJ. 1999 Aug 10;161(3):255-60.
2
Lisinopril. A review of its pharmacology and clinical efficacy in elderly patients.赖诺普利:老年患者药理学与临床疗效综述
Drugs Aging. 1997 Feb;10(2):131-66. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199710020-00006.
3
The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET). Rationale, methodology and comparison with previous trials.高龄老人高血压试验(HYVET)。原理、方法及与以往试验的比较。
Drugs Aging. 1994 Sep;5(3):171-83. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199405030-00003.