Drobnis E Z, Zhong C Q, Overstreet J W
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis 95616.
J Androl. 1991 May-Jun;12(3):201-8.
The following methods were evaluated for their ability to separate motile cryopreserved sperm from semen after thawing: single washing, Percoll separation followed by a single washing, and Sephadex column separation. For Sephadex separation, washing, and Percoll separation, percent recovery of motile sperm was 65%, 76%, and 28%, and motility was 81%, 39%, and 60%, respectively. Percoll separation and washing were the best methods for removing seminal constituents, but sperm velocity and linearity were lower after Percoll separation and washing than after Sephadex separation. During 3 hours of incubation, there was an additional decrease in the motility, viability (exclusion of supravital dye), velocity, linearity, and intact acrosomes of Percoll-separated sperm, indicating that Percoll separation may not be suitable for cryopreserved sperm. Motile, washed sperm also had lower velocities and higher spontaneous acrosome reactions than Sephadex-separated sperm, but velocity and linearity were maintained during incubation. When semen was separated with Sephadex followed by washing, motility was well maintained (84%). The Sephadex method is a promising technique for selecting and concentrating motile cryopreserved sperm.
单次洗涤、Percoll分离后单次洗涤以及Sephadex柱分离。对于Sephadex分离、洗涤以及Percoll分离,活动精子的回收率分别为65%、76%和28%,活力分别为81%、39%和60%。Percoll分离和洗涤是去除精液成分的最佳方法,但Percoll分离和洗涤后的精子速度和直线性低于Sephadex分离后的。在孵育3小时期间,Percoll分离的精子的活力、生存力(排斥活体染料)、速度、直线性和完整顶体进一步下降,表明Percoll分离可能不适用于冷冻精子。活动的洗涤精子的速度也低于Sephadex分离的精子,且自发顶体反应更高,但在孵育期间速度和直线性得以维持。当精液先用Sephadex分离然后洗涤时,活力得到良好维持(84%)。Sephadex方法是一种有前景的选择和浓缩活动冷冻精子的技术。