Mark R. Beriau is Athletic Trainer at Maine Sports Medicine, Waterville, ME.
J Athl Train. 1994 Sep;29(3):224-30.
The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of wearing the Aircast(TM) Sports Stirrup, Aircast(TM) Training brace, Swede-O(TM) brace, and DonJoy(TM) Ankle Ligament Protector while running an agility course. Eighty-five high school athletes with no history of ankle injury and no experience in wearing any ankle support served as subjects. Each subject participated in four separate testing sessions. During sessions 1 and 4, subjects ran the agility course under the control (unbraced) conditions. Sessions 2 and 3 consisted of randomly wearing the ankle braces while running the agility course. A questionnaire concerning support, comfort, and restriction was completed by each subject after wearing each of the braces. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures revealed that a significant difference existed between the agility times. Tukey's post hoc test indicated that a significant difference existed between each ankle brace and the control 2 agility times as well as a control 1 and control 2 time difference. The control time difference was attributed to a learning effect. An ANOVA with repeated measures of only the four braces revealed that a significant difference existed between the agility times. Tukey's post hoc test showed the only difference was between the DonJoy Ankle Ligament Protector and the Aircast Training brace. We concluded: 1) there is limited practical performance effect upon agility while wearing an ankle brace; and 2) an athlete's perceived comfort, support, and performance restriction are contributing factors that may directly influence the effectiveness of ankle bracing.
本研究的目的是比较在跑步时使用 Aircast(TM)运动马镫、Aircast(TM)训练支具、Swede-O(TM)支具和 DonJoy(TM)踝关节韧带保护器的效果。85 名没有踝关节受伤史且没有佩戴任何踝关节支撑物经验的高中生运动员作为研究对象。每个研究对象参加了四个独立的测试阶段。在第 1 次和第 4 次测试中,研究对象在控制(未佩戴)条件下跑步通过敏捷性测试。第 2 次和第 3 次测试包括在跑步通过敏捷性测试时随机佩戴踝关节支具。每个研究对象在佩戴每个支具后都填写了一份关于支撑、舒适度和限制的调查问卷。重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)显示,敏捷时间之间存在显著差异。Tukey 事后检验表明,每个踝关节支具与控制 2 敏捷时间之间以及控制 1 和控制 2 时间差异之间存在显著差异。控制时间差异归因于学习效应。仅对四个支具进行重复测量的 ANOVA 显示,敏捷时间之间存在显著差异。Tukey 事后检验表明,唯一的差异是 DonJoy 踝关节韧带保护器和 Aircast 训练支具之间的差异。我们得出结论:1)佩戴踝关节支具对敏捷性的实际表现效果有限;2)运动员的感知舒适度、支撑力和性能限制是可能直接影响踝关节支具效果的因素。