David L. Paris is Associate Professor and Athletic Therapy Coordinator at Department of Exercise Science, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H4B 1R6.
J Athl Train. 1995 Sep;30(3):223-8.
Tape has traditionally been used to support the ankle during activity. More recently, commercial ankle braces have been worn as an alternative. The cumulative information on the effects of taped versus braced ankle support or interbrace comparisons is inconclusive. With few exceptions, ankle brace studies have collected data soon after support conditions were administered. Plantar-dorsiflexion and inversion-eversion ranges of motion (ROM) of 30 subjects were compared under conditions of unsupported, nonelastic adhesivetaped, and Swede-O and Sub Talar Support-braced ankles. We recorded measurements before activity and after periods of 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes of selected activity on a motorized treadmill. All support conditions significantly reduced preactivity ROM in all directions compared to unsupported ankles. Results showed that the ankle significantly increased in plantarflexion ROM 15 minutes after the initiation of activity with tape or the SubTalar Support-brace, and after 30 minutes with the Swede-O brace. Tape showed further significant increases in plantarflexion ROM after 15-minute intervals of 30, 45, and 60 minutes of activity. All three support conditions had increased significantly in inversion ROM by 15 minutes of activity. The SubTalar Support brace showed a further significant inversion ROM increase between 15 and 30 minutes postactivity. We conclude that the Swede-O and SubTalar Support braces and tape offer significant preactivity ankle support in all four directions of movement. We also conclude that both braces offer longer postactivity support than tape. In inversion ROM and plantarflexion ROM, actions prevalent in ankle sprains, the Swede-O brace retained support longer than the SubTalar Support brace.
胶带传统上用于在活动期间支撑脚踝。最近,商业用的踝部支具也被作为替代物使用。关于贴扎与支具支撑踝关节支持或支具间比较效果的累积信息尚无定论。除了少数例外,踝部支具研究通常在施加支撑条件后不久收集数据。在无支撑、非弹性粘性胶带和 Swede-O 以及 Sub Talar 支撑支具的情况下,比较了 30 名受试者的背屈/跖屈和内翻/外翻活动范围(ROM)。在电动跑步机上进行一段时间的活动之前和之后,我们记录了测量值 15、30、45 和 60 分钟。与无支撑踝关节相比,所有支撑条件在所有方向上均明显降低了活动前的 ROM。结果表明,在活动开始后 15 分钟,胶带或 SubTalar 支撑支具的情况下,踝关节跖屈 ROM 显著增加,而在 30 分钟后,Swede-O 支具的情况下也是如此。在 30、45 和 60 分钟的活动后 15 分钟间隔内,胶带显示出进一步的显著跖屈 ROM 增加。所有三种支撑条件在活动 15 分钟后内翻 ROM 均显著增加。SubTalar 支撑支具在活动后 15 至 30 分钟之间显示出进一步的显著内翻 ROM 增加。我们得出结论,Swede-O 和 SubTalar 支撑支具和胶带在所有四个运动方向上均提供显著的活动前踝关节支撑。我们还得出结论,与胶带相比,这两种支具在活动后提供的支撑时间更长。在旋后 ROM 和跖屈 ROM 中,这两种支具都比 SubTalar 支撑支具提供了更长的支持,旋后 ROM 和跖屈 ROM 是踝关节扭伤中常见的动作。