Hubbard Tricia J, Kaminski Thomas W
The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
J Athl Train. 2002 Dec;37(4):481-486.
To determine whether subjects with functional ankle instability suffered kinesthetic deficits in the injured ankle compared with the healthy ankle and to examine the effect of prophylactic ankle bracing on kinesthesia in uninjured and functionally unstable ankles. DESIGN AND SETTING: We tested subjects over 4 consecutive days in a climate-controlled athletic training/sports medicine laboratory setting. A single-group time-series design enabled all subjects to serve as their own controls. A different bracing condition was tested on each of those occasions. SUBJECTS: Sixteen subjects (8 men, 8 women; age = 21.6 +/- 1.7 years; mass = 73.5 +/- 15.0 kg; height = 172.9 +/- 8.8 cm) with unilateral functional ankle instability participated in this study. MEASUREMENTS: Kinesthetic threshold-to-detection of passive motion (TTDPM) measurements were obtained during passive inversion and eversion movements (0.5 degrees.s(-1)) under 4 different bracing or taping conditions (unbraced, Swede-O Ankle Lok, Aircast Air-Stirrup, and tape). RESULTS: We analyzed the data using a 3-factor analysis of variance with repeated measures on the ankle and motion factors. Threshold-to-detection of passive motion scores in the unbraced condition were significantly better than the TTDPM scores in any of the other 3 test conditions. No significant differences were seen in TTDPM scores between the 2 ankles under any of the 4 conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Threshold-to-detection of passive motion scores did not differ in uninjured ankles and those with functional instability; however, bracing with either the Ankle Lok or Air-Stirrup decreased the ability to detect passive motion when compared with the no-tape (unbraced) condition. Further research is needed to determine the exact contributions of taping and bracing on ankle joint kinesthesia.
确定与健康踝关节相比,功能性踝关节不稳受试者受伤的踝关节是否存在本体感觉缺陷,并研究预防性踝关节支具对未受伤和功能性不稳踝关节本体感觉的影响。
我们在气候可控的运动训练/运动医学实验室环境中对受试者进行了连续4天的测试。单组时间序列设计使所有受试者都能作为自己的对照。在每个测试场合测试不同的支具条件。
16名单侧功能性踝关节不稳的受试者(8名男性,8名女性;年龄=21.6±1.7岁;体重=73.5±15.0千克;身高=172.9±8.8厘米)参与了本研究。
在4种不同的支具或贴扎条件(无支具、瑞典式踝关节固定器、Aircast空气夹板和贴扎)下,在被动内翻和外翻运动(0.5度·秒⁻¹)期间获得被动运动检测阈值(TTDPM)测量值。
我们使用三因素方差分析对数据进行分析,对踝关节和运动因素进行重复测量。无支具条件下的被动运动检测阈值评分显著优于其他3种测试条件下的TTDPM评分。在4种条件中的任何一种下,两个踝关节之间的TTDPM评分均无显著差异。
未受伤的踝关节和功能性不稳的踝关节之间的被动运动检测阈值评分没有差异;然而,与无贴扎(无支具)条件相比,使用踝关节固定器或空气夹板支具会降低检测被动运动的能力。需要进一步研究以确定贴扎和支具对踝关节本体感觉的确切作用。