Suppr超能文献

等速与等张预测一项功能任务的比较。

A comparison of isokinetic and isotonic predictions of a functional task.

出版信息

J Athl Train. 1995 Oct;30(4):319-22.

Abstract

Controversy still exists regarding the use of isokinetic and isotonic exercise in rehabilitation. Many authors have compared these two types of training methods on various strength measures and functional activity, but have used open kinetic chain training. The purposes of this investigation were to determine: 1) which form of closed kinetic chain training, isokinetic or isotonic, would produce the greatest increase in one-legged jump reaction force, and 2) which training method most accurately predicts peak force produced during a one-legged jump. Forty-two legs from 21 female volunteer subjects were used. Each subject had her dominant and nondominant extremities identified, and then each extremity was randomly assigned to either isokinetic training, isotonic training, or control. Both training groups trained using a leg press exercise 3 days a week for 5 weeks, while the control extremities did not train. The isokinetic extremities were trained using a velocity spectrum (two sets of 10 repetitions at each speed: 60 degrees , 180 degrees and 240 degrees /sec) and the isotonic extremities trained using the DAPRE technique. Data were analyzed with an analysis of variance (ANOVA). There was no difference between the three groups for change in one-legged jump force. Both isokinetic and isotonic groups increased strength after training, but these changes did not correlate with changes in one-legged jump reaction force. These results suggest that changes in neither isokinetic force nor isotonic weight lifted developed in a nonweight-bearing closed kinetic chain, directly translate into increased force production during a functional activity.

摘要

在康复中使用等速运动和等张运动仍然存在争议。许多作者已经在各种力量测量和功能活动上比较了这两种训练方法,但都使用了开链训练。本研究的目的是确定:1)哪种闭链训练形式,等速运动或等张运动,会产生最大的单腿跳跃反应力增加,2)哪种训练方法最能准确预测单腿跳跃时产生的峰值力。来自 21 名女性志愿者的 42 条腿被用于本研究。每位受试者确定了其优势和非优势肢体,然后随机将每条肢体分配到等速运动训练、等张运动训练或对照组。两组训练者每周使用腿蹬练习器训练 3 天,共 5 周,而对照组的肢体不进行训练。等速肢体使用速度谱(在每种速度下进行两组 10 次重复:60 度、180 度和 240 度/秒)进行训练,等张肢体使用 DAPRE 技术进行训练。使用方差分析(ANOVA)对数据进行分析。三组之间在单腿跳跃力的变化上没有差异。等速运动和等张运动组在训练后力量都有所增加,但这些变化与单腿跳跃反应力的变化没有相关性。这些结果表明,在非承重闭链中发展的等速力量或等张举重的变化,并没有直接转化为功能活动中力量产生的增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ae7/1318001/bc7adbb59b4d/jathtrain00024-0034-a.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验