Cooney N L, Kadden R M, Litt M D, Getter H
Veterans Affairs Medical Center, West Haven, Connecticut 06516.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991 Aug;59(4):598-601. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.59.4.598.
Ninety-six subjects were recruited from an inpatient alcoholism treatment program and randomly assigned to aftercare group treatment with either coping skills training or interactional therapy. Survival analyses using 2-year outcome data provided evidence for the durability of matching interaction effects. The data supported a priori hypotheses that individuals scoring high on measures of sociopathy or global psychopathology have better outcomes in coping skills treatment, whereas patients low on these dimensions have better outcomes in interactional treatment. Contrary to the original hypothesis, patients with cognitive impairment had better outcomes in interactional treatment, and patients without cognitive impairment did better in coping skills treatment.
96名受试者从一个住院酒精成瘾治疗项目中招募而来，并被随机分配到后续护理组，接受应对技能训练或互动疗法。使用2年随访数据进行的生存分析为匹配互动效应的持续性提供了证据。数据支持了先验假设，即反社会人格或总体精神病理学测量得分高的个体在应对技能治疗中预后更好，而在这些维度得分低的患者在互动治疗中预后更好。与原假设相反，认知障碍患者在互动治疗中预后更好，而无认知障碍的患者在应对技能治疗中表现更佳。
