Chuong Cheng-Ming, Wu Ping, Plikus Maksim, Jiang Ting-Xin, Bruce Widelitz Randall
Department of Pathology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90033, USA.
Curr Top Dev Biol. 2006;72:237-74. doi: 10.1016/S0070-2153(05)72005-6.
To accomplish regenerative medicine, several critical issues in stem cell biology have to be solved, including the identification of sources, the expanding population, building them into organs, and assimilating them to the host. Although many stem cells can now differentiate along certain lineages, knowledge on how to use them to build organs lags behind. Here we focus on topobiological events that bridge this gap, for example, the regulation of number, size, axes, shape, arrangement, and architecture during organogenesis. Rather than reviewing detail molecular pathways known to disrupt organogenesis when perturbed, we highlight conceptual questions at the topobiological level and ask how cellular and molecular mechanisms can work to explain these phenomena. The avian integument is used as the Rosetta stone because the molecular activities are linked to organ forms that are visually apparent and have functional consequences during evolution with fossil records and extant diversity. For example, we show that feather pattern formation is the equilibrium of stochastic interactions among multiple activators and inhibitors. Although morphogens and receptors are coded by the genome, the result is based on the summed physical-chemical properties on the whole cell's surface and is self-organizing. For another example, we show that developing chicken and duck beaks contain differently configured localized growth zones (LoGZs) and can modulate chicken beaks to phenocopy diverse avian beaks in nature by altering the position, number, size, and duration of LoGZs. Different organs have their unique topology and we also discuss shaping mechanisms of liver and different ways of branching morphogenesis. Multi-primordium organs (e.g., feathers, hairs, and teeth) have additional topographic specificities across the body surface, an appendage field, or within an appendage. Promises and problems in reconstitute feather/hair follicles and other organs are discussed. Finally, simple modification at the topobiological level may lead to novel morphology for natural selection at the evolution level.
为实现再生医学,干细胞生物学中的几个关键问题必须得到解决,包括来源的鉴定、细胞群体的扩增、将它们构建成器官以及使其与宿主同化。尽管现在许多干细胞能够沿着特定谱系分化,但关于如何利用它们构建器官的知识却滞后了。在这里,我们关注那些弥合这一差距的拓扑生物学事件,例如器官发生过程中数量、大小、轴、形状、排列和结构的调控。我们并非详细回顾已知在受到干扰时会破坏器官发生的分子途径,而是强调拓扑生物学层面的概念性问题,并探讨细胞和分子机制如何发挥作用来解释这些现象。鸟类体表被用作解读关键信息的工具,因为分子活动与在进化过程中通过化石记录和现存多样性而在视觉上明显且具有功能后果的器官形态相关联。例如,我们表明羽毛图案的形成是多种激活剂和抑制剂之间随机相互作用的平衡。尽管形态发生素和受体由基因组编码,但结果是基于整个细胞表面的综合物理化学性质,并且是自组织的。再举一个例子,我们表明发育中的鸡和鸭喙包含不同配置的局部生长区(LoGZs),并且通过改变LoGZs的位置、数量、大小和持续时间,可以将鸡喙调节成自然界中各种鸟类喙的表型。不同器官具有其独特的拓扑结构,我们还讨论了肝脏的塑造机制以及分支形态发生的不同方式。多原基器官(如羽毛、毛发和牙齿)在身体表面、附属器区域或附属器内部具有额外的地形特异性。讨论了在重建毛囊和其他器官方面的前景和问题。最后,在拓扑生物学层面进行简单修改可能会在进化层面导致新的形态以供自然选择。