Broghammer Joshua A, Langenburg Scott E, Smith Sue Jane, Santucci Richard A
Department of Urology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Urology. 2006 Apr;67(4):823-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.11.062. Epub 2006 Mar 29.
To review the conservative management of pediatric renal trauma and investigate the significance of associated nonrenal injuries.
We performed a retrospective review of 63 pediatric patients with blunt renal injury who were treated expectantly. A comparison was made between operative and nonoperative management, mechanism of injury, treatment complications, requirement for blood transfusion, length of hospital stay, associated injuries, and incidence of pre-existing urologic conditions.
The renal injury grade was grade I in 31 patients, grade II in 12, grade III in 8, grade IV in 10, and grade V in 2. Two patients underwent acute surgical exploration; one for nonrenal causes and one (2%) for life-threatening renal bleeding (grade V injury). Renorrhaphy was not performed, and 98% of patients were initially treated nonoperatively. Three patients (5%) underwent delayed renal surgery: one nephrectomy for Wilms' tumor, one partial nephrectomy for nonhealing grade IV injury, and one attempted repair of a renal pelvis injury with subsequent nephrectomy. Excluding 1 patient who died and one nephrectomy for tumor control, our renal salvage rate was 97% (59 of 61). The overall mean hospital stay was 7.7 days and was similar across all grades (grade I, 7.7 days; grade II, 7.8; grade III, 6.1; grade IV, 9.2; and grade V, 10.5 days).
The results of our study have shown that pediatric patients with blunt nonexsanguinating renal injuries treated conservatively do well. The length of hospital stay did not increase with worsening severity of renal injury and, instead, was determined by the severity of the nonrenal associated injuries. This report adds to a growing body of published data that suggest that conservative management of pediatric blunt renal trauma is safe.
回顾小儿肾外伤的保守治疗,并探讨相关非肾损伤的意义。
我们对63例接受保守治疗的小儿钝性肾损伤患者进行了回顾性研究。比较了手术和非手术治疗、损伤机制、治疗并发症、输血需求、住院时间、相关损伤以及既往泌尿系统疾病的发生率。
63例患者中,肾损伤分级为Ⅰ级31例,Ⅱ级12例,Ⅲ级8例,Ⅳ级10例,Ⅴ级2例。2例患者接受了急诊手术探查:1例因非肾原因,1例(2%)因危及生命的肾出血(Ⅴ级损伤)。未进行肾缝合术,98%的患者最初接受非手术治疗。3例患者(5%)接受了延迟肾手术:1例因肾母细胞瘤行肾切除术,1例因Ⅳ级损伤不愈合行部分肾切除术,1例尝试修复肾盂损伤后行肾切除术。排除1例死亡患者和1例因控制肿瘤而行肾切除术的患者,我们的肾脏挽救率为97%(61例中的59例)。总体平均住院时间为7.7天,各分级患者相似(Ⅰ级,7.7天;Ⅱ级,7.8天;Ⅲ级,6.1天;Ⅳ级,9.2天;Ⅴ级,10.5天)。
我们的研究结果表明,保守治疗小儿钝性非出血性肾损伤效果良好。住院时间并未随肾损伤严重程度的加重而增加,而是由相关非肾损伤的严重程度决定。本报告补充了越来越多的已发表数据,表明小儿钝性肾外伤的保守治疗是安全的。