Taylor-Gooby Peter, Zinn Jens O
School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research, University of Kent, UK.
Risk Anal. 2006 Apr;26(2):397-411. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00746.x.
This article reviews the main approaches to risk in psychology and sociology and considers recent developments. It shows that research continues from a wide range of perspectives. Some developments in psychological thinking have recently acknowledged the importance of the cultural framing of risk perceptions and responses and the positive power of emotions to manage uncertainties, while some streams of work in sociology have moved toward more individualist approaches. These converging processes open opportunities for cross-fertilization and for using insights from both disciplines in the development of research.
本文回顾了心理学和社会学中关于风险的主要研究方法,并探讨了近期的发展情况。研究表明,从广泛的视角来看,相关研究仍在持续进行。心理学思维的一些新发展最近认识到了风险认知与应对的文化框架的重要性,以及情绪在管理不确定性方面的积极作用;而社会学的一些研究方向则转向了更为个人主义的方法。这些趋同的过程为学科间的交叉融合以及在研究发展中运用来自这两个学科的见解创造了机会。