Lai Philip, Propst Evan Jon, Papsin Blake Croll
Department of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont., Canada.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2006 Aug;70(8):1423-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2006.02.012. Epub 2006 Mar 30.
To describe the lateral graft type 1 tympanoplasty technique using AlloDerm for tympanic membrane reconstruction in children and to compare its surgical and audiometric outcomes with the traditional underlay type 1 tympanoplasty.
The records of 34 consecutive children undergoing type 1 tympanoplasty between 2004 and 2005 were reviewed; 18 received lateral graft tympanoplasty with AlloDerm and 16 received underlay tympanoplasty (8 AlloDerm and 8 temporalis fascia). Pre- and post-surgical audiograms, speech reception threshold, closure rate and complication rate were evaluated using one-way and repeated measures ANOVAs.
Children who underwent lateral graft type 1 tympanoplasty pre-operatively had larger tympanic membrane perforations, worse pure tone averages, air bone gaps and speech reception thresholds as compared with children undergoing underlay type 1 tympanoplasty (P<0.001). Pure tone averages and air bone gaps improved significantly with surgery in both lateral and underlay type 1 tympanoplasty groups (P<0.05), with both groups achieving comparable postoperative audiometric outcomes (P>0.01). The lateral graft group demonstrated a higher perforation closure rate (94%) as compared with both underlay groups (88%). Complication rates were virtually non-existent.
Despite larger perforations and worse pre-operative audiometric scores, children who underwent lateral graft type 1 tympanoplasty achieved comparable postoperative audiometric results and perforation closure rates as compared with children who underwent underlay type 1 tympanoplasty. Results suggest that lateral graft type 1 tympanoplasty using AlloDerm is effective for tympanic membrane reconstruction in children and should be used when temporalis fascia is not available or the extent of the perforation limits its use.
描述使用同种异体真皮进行儿童鼓膜重建的外侧移植型1鼓室成形术技术,并将其手术和听力结果与传统的夹层型1鼓室成形术进行比较。
回顾了2004年至2005年间连续接受1型鼓室成形术的34例儿童的记录;18例接受了使用同种异体真皮的外侧移植鼓室成形术,16例接受了夹层鼓室成形术(8例使用同种异体真皮,8例使用颞肌筋膜)。使用单因素方差分析和重复测量方差分析评估手术前后的听力图、言语接受阈值、闭合率和并发症发生率。
与接受夹层型1鼓室成形术的儿童相比,接受外侧移植型1鼓室成形术的儿童术前鼓膜穿孔更大,纯音平均值、气骨导差和言语接受阈值更差(P<0.001)。外侧和夹层型1鼓室成形术组的纯音平均值和气骨导差在手术后均有显著改善(P<0.05),两组术后听力结果相当(P>0.01)。外侧移植组的穿孔闭合率(94%)高于两个夹层组(88%)。并发症发生率几乎为零。
尽管穿孔较大且术前听力评分较差,但接受外侧移植型1鼓室成形术的儿童与接受夹层型1鼓室成形术的儿童相比,术后听力结果和穿孔闭合率相当。结果表明,使用同种异体真皮的外侧移植型1鼓室成形术对儿童鼓膜重建有效,当无法获得颞肌筋膜或穿孔范围限制其使用时应采用。