Liu Qi, Fayad Luis, Cabanillas Fernando, Hagemeister Fredrick B, Ayers Gregory D, Hess Mark, Romaguera Jorge, Rodriguez M Alma, Tsimberidou Apostolia M, Verstovsek Srdan, Younes Anas, Pro Barbara, Lee Ming-Sheng, Ayala Ana, McLaughlin Peter
Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Apr 1;24(10):1582-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.3696.
Advanced-stage follicular lymphoma is considered incurable. The pace of improvements in treatment has been slow. This article analyzes five sequential cohorts of patients with stage IV follicular lymphoma treated between 1972 and 2002.
Five consecutive studies (two were randomized trials) involving 580 patients were analyzed for overall survival (OS), failure-free survival (FFS), and survival after first relapse. A proportional hazards analysis, and subset analyses using the follicular lymphoma international prognostic index (FLIPI) score were performed. Treatment regimens included: cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, bleomycin (CHOP-Bleo); CHOP-Bleo followed by interferon alfa (IFN-alpha); a rotation of three regimens (alternating triple therapy), followed by IFN-alpha; fludarabine, mitoxantrone, dexamethasone (FND) followed by IFN-alpha; and FND plus delayed versus concurrent rituximab followed by IFN-alpha.
Improvements in 5-year OS (from 64% to 95%) and FFS (from 29% to 60%) indicate steady progress, perhaps partly due to more effective salvage therapies, but the FFS data also indicate improved front-line therapies; these observations held true after controlling for differences in prognostic factors among the cohorts. The FLIPI model adds rigor to and facilitates comparisons among the different cohorts. An unexpected finding in this study was a trend toward an apparent FFS plateau.
Evolving therapy, including the incorporation of biologic agents, has led to stepwise significant outcome improvements for patients with advanced-stage follicular lymphoma. The apparent plateau in the FFS curve, starting approximately 8 to 10 years from the beginning of treatment, raises the issue of the potential curability of these patients.
晚期滤泡性淋巴瘤被认为无法治愈。治疗进展缓慢。本文分析了1972年至2002年间接受治疗的五组连续的IV期滤泡性淋巴瘤患者。
对涉及580名患者的五项连续研究(两项为随机试验)进行总生存期(OS)、无失败生存期(FFS)和首次复发后生存期分析。进行了比例风险分析,并使用滤泡性淋巴瘤国际预后指数(FLIPI)评分进行亚组分析。治疗方案包括:环磷酰胺、阿霉素、长春新碱、泼尼松、博来霉素(CHOP-Bleo);CHOP-Bleo后接α干扰素(IFN-α);三种方案轮换(交替三联疗法),后接IFN-α;氟达拉滨、米托蒽醌、地塞米松(FND)后接IFN-α;FND加延迟或同时使用利妥昔单抗后接IFN-α。
5年OS(从64%提高到95%)和FFS(从29%提高到60%)的改善表明有稳步进展,这可能部分归因于更有效的挽救疗法,但FFS数据也表明一线疗法有所改善;在控制各队列预后因素差异后,这些观察结果仍然成立。FLIPI模型增强了不同队列之间比较的严谨性并便于进行比较。本研究中一个意外发现是FFS似乎出现平台期的趋势。
不断发展的治疗方法,包括生物制剂的加入,已使晚期滤泡性淋巴瘤患者的治疗结果逐步得到显著改善。从治疗开始约8至10年起,FFS曲线中明显的平台期引发了这些患者潜在可治愈性的问题。