Suppr超能文献

质子泵抑制剂的治疗性替代政策:临床和经济后果

A therapeutic substitution policy for proton pump inhibitors: clinical and economic consequences.

作者信息

Schneeweiss Sebastian, Maclure Malcolm, Dormuth Colin R, Glynn Robert J, Canning Claire, Avorn Jerry

机构信息

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02120, USA.

出版信息

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Apr;79(4):379-88. doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2005.12.304.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

With the growing need to provide prescription drug benefits to older patients and to contain costs, it will be necessary to direct that coverage so as to make expenditures as efficient as possible. We evaluated the clinical and economic consequences of coverage restriction for 3 leading proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in a large-scale natural experiment.

METHODS

The study design was a time-trend analysis in the setting of a provincial drug benefits program in British Columbia, Canada. We studied all British Columbia residents aged 66 or older (N = 501,104) using linked data on all prescription drug dispensings, physician services, and hospitalizations between January 2002 and June 2004. The new policy restricted coverage to rabeprazole and required treatment failure with a histamine H2 blocker. More widely used PPIs (omeprazole, pantoprazole, and lansoprazole) had to be paid for out of pocket, unless the physician requested an exemption. The main outcome measures were utilization of PPIs, drug discontinuation rates, gastrointestinal hemorrhage rates, and drug expenditures.

RESULTS

Utilization of the restricted PPIs declined sharply after the policy change (-14,850 daily doses per month per 10,000 residents, P < .0001), whereas use of the covered PPI increased sharply (+19,300, P < .0001), with 45% of all PPI users switching to the covered agent within 6 months. We found no increased use of H2 blockers or stopping of gastroprotective drugs. There was no increase in the monthly rate of hospitalization for gastrointestinal hemorrhage after the PPI restriction (P = .35) even though the study had the power to detect increases of 24 events per 10,000 residents with 95% confidence. There was a slight increase in physician visits 3 months after the policy change (P = .01) for a 2-month period when 9% of new rabeprazole users were switched back to a restricted PPI. In the first 6 months of the policy change, the provincial health plan saved at least 2.9 million Canadian dollars as a result of the policy change.

CONCLUSIONS

Coverage restriction of 3 leading PPIs led to substantial utilization changes and savings, without increased noncompliance or clinical complication.

摘要

目的

鉴于为老年患者提供处方药福利并控制成本的需求不断增加,有必要对保险范围进行指导,以使支出尽可能高效。我们在一项大规模自然实验中评估了对3种主要质子泵抑制剂(PPI)实行保险范围限制的临床和经济后果。

方法

研究设计为在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的省级药物福利计划背景下进行的时间趋势分析。我们利用2002年1月至2004年6月期间所有处方药配药、医生服务和住院治疗的关联数据,对所有66岁及以上的不列颠哥伦比亚省居民(N = 501,104)进行了研究。新政策将保险范围限制为雷贝拉唑,并要求使用组胺H2受体阻滞剂治疗失败。除非医生申请豁免,否则更广泛使用的PPI(奥美拉唑、泮托拉唑和兰索拉唑)必须自掏腰包支付费用。主要结局指标为PPI的使用情况、停药率、胃肠道出血率和药物支出。

结果

政策变更后,受限PPI的使用量急剧下降(每10,000居民每月减少14,850日剂量,P <.0001),而获批PPI的使用量急剧增加(增加19,300,P <.0001),45% 的PPI使用者在6个月内转而使用获批药物。我们发现H2受体阻滞剂的使用没有增加,也没有停用胃保护药物。PPI限制实施后,胃肠道出血的每月住院率没有增加(P =.35),尽管该研究有能力以95% 的置信度检测出每10,000居民增加24例事件。政策变更3个月后,在为期2个月的时间里,9% 的新雷贝拉唑使用者转回受限PPI,医生就诊次数略有增加(P =.01)。在政策变更的前6个月,省级医疗计划因政策变更至少节省了290万加元。

结论

对3种主要PPI实行保险范围限制导致了使用情况的大幅变化和节省,且未增加不依从性或临床并发症。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验