Swenson I, Foster B H, Champagne M
School of Nursing, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599.
J Nurs Educ. 1991 Sep;30(7):320-5. doi: 10.3928/0148-4834-19910901-08.
Responses of schools of nursing to physically, mentally, and substance-impaired applicants and matriculating students were assessed in a 12% simple random sample (n = 132) of the 383 baccalaureate and 715 associate degree nursing schools and programs accredited by the National League for Nursing. A self-administered questionnaire concerning experiences, policies, procedures, and factors influencing decision-making was sent to the 132 deans and directors of the nursing schools and programs. Criteria for defining impairments, resources for developing criteria, methods of identifying impairments, actions taken, and individuals involved in the decision were also assessed. While the schools used external resources to guide decision-making, the majority of the responsibility was with the school of nursing faculty and administration. Schools offered a range of options for impaired individuals continuing in the program while under treatment; nevertheless, seeking treatment was a frequent requirement for continuation in the program.
在由美国国家护理联盟认证的383所学士学位护理学院和715所副学士学位护理学院及项目中,抽取了12%的简单随机样本(n = 132),对护理学院针对身体、精神和药物使用方面存在障碍的申请者及入学学生的应对情况进行了评估。一份关于经历、政策、程序以及影响决策因素的自填式问卷被发送给这132所护理学院及项目的院长和主任。还评估了定义障碍的标准、制定标准的资源、识别障碍的方法、采取的行动以及参与决策的人员。虽然学校利用外部资源来指导决策,但大部分责任在于护理学院的教师和管理人员。学校为正在接受治疗的障碍个体继续留在项目中提供了一系列选择;然而,寻求治疗是继续留在项目中的常见要求。