Suppr超能文献

用于评估医院实施的住院医师计算机医嘱录入系统的跳蛙方法的开发。

Development of the Leapfrog methodology for evaluating hospital implemented inpatient computerized physician order entry systems.

作者信息

Kilbridge P M, Welebob E M, Classen D C

机构信息

Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.

出版信息

Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Apr;15(2):81-4. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.014969.

Abstract

The 1999 Institute of Medicine report raised public awareness of the frequency and cost of adverse drug events in medicine. In response, in November 2000 a coalition of healthcare purchasers announced the formation of the Leapfrog Group, an organization dedicated to making "great leaps forward" in the safety and quality of health care in America. Their first target-computerized physician order entry (CPOE)-was selected specifically for its potential to reduce harm to patients from medications. The Leapfrog inpatient CPOE standard included a requirement that the organization operating CPOE should demonstrate via a test that their inpatient CPOE system can alert physicians to at least 50% of common serious prescribing errors. This paper outlines the development of this test which evaluates the ability of implemented CPOE systems to prevent the occurrence of medication errors that have a high likelihood of leading to adverse drug events. A framework was developed to include 12 different categories of CPOE based decision support that could prevent prescribing errors leading to adverse drug events. A scoring system was developed based on the known frequency and severity of adverse drug events. Simulated test patients and accompanying simulated test medication orders were developed to evaluate the ability of a CPOE system to intercept prescribing errors in all 12 decision support categories. The test was validated at a number of inpatient sites using both commercially available and custom developed CPOE systems. A web based application was developed to allow hospitals to self-administer the evaluation.

摘要

1999年医学研究所的报告提高了公众对医疗中药物不良事件发生频率和成本的认识。作为回应,2000年11月,医疗保健购买者联盟宣布成立“跨越组织”,该组织致力于在美国医疗保健的安全和质量方面实现“巨大飞跃”。他们的第一个目标——计算机化医师医嘱录入(CPOE)——因其具有减少药物对患者造成伤害的潜力而被特别选定。“跨越组织”的住院患者CPOE标准包括一项要求,即运行CPOE的组织应通过测试证明其住院患者CPOE系统能够提醒医生注意至少50%的常见严重处方错误。本文概述了该测试的开发过程,该测试评估已实施的CPOE系统预防很可能导致药物不良事件的用药错误发生的能力。开发了一个框架,纳入12种不同类别的基于CPOE的决策支持,这些支持可以预防导致药物不良事件的处方错误。根据已知的药物不良事件发生频率和严重程度开发了一个评分系统。开发了模拟测试患者和相应的模拟测试用药医嘱,以评估CPOE系统在所有12个决策支持类别中拦截处方错误的能力。该测试在多个住院地点使用商用和定制开发得CPOE系统进行了验证。开发了一个基于网络的应用程序,以便医院能够自行进行评估。

相似文献

3
Computerized physician order entry of medications and clinical decision support can improve problem list documentation compliance.
Int J Med Inform. 2010 May;79(5):332-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.05.005. Epub 2008 Jul 2.
4
Cost-effectiveness of an electronic medication ordering system (CPOE/CDSS) in hospitalized patients.
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Aug;83(8):572-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 May 23.
5
Acceptability and feasibility of the Leapfrog computerized physician order entry evaluation tool for hospitals outside the United States.
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Sep;84(9):694-701. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.05.011. Epub 2015 May 22.
6
Effect of computerisation on the quality and safety of chemotherapy prescription.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Dec;15(6):418-21. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.016808.
7
Evaluation and certification of computerized provider order entry systems.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Jan-Feb;14(1):48-55. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2248. Epub 2006 Oct 31.
10
Mixed results in the safety performance of computerized physician order entry.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Apr;29(4):655-63. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0160.

引用本文的文献

3
Interprofessional Evaluation of a Medication Clinical Decision Support System Prior to Implementation.
Appl Clin Inform. 2024 May;15(3):637-649. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1787184. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
7
Use of a Clinical Decision Support System Alert to Prevent Supratherapeutic Vancomycin Concentrations.
J Pharm Technol. 2014 Oct;30(5):175-178. doi: 10.1177/8755122514544127. Epub 2014 Jul 21.
8
Assessing hospital electronic health record vendor performance across publicly reported quality measures.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Sep 18;28(10):2101-2107. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab120.
9
The Development and Piloting of the Ambulatory Electronic Health Record Evaluation Tool: Lessons Learned.
Appl Clin Inform. 2021 Jan;12(1):153-163. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1722917. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
10
Development of a Taxonomy for Medication-Related Patient Safety Events Related to Health Information Technology in Pediatrics.
Appl Clin Inform. 2020 Oct;11(5):714-724. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1717084. Epub 2020 Oct 28.

本文引用的文献

2
Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors.
JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1197-203. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.10.1197.
3
Effect of a computerized prescriber-order-entry system on reported medication errors.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2005 Feb 15;62(4):416-9. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/62.4.0416.
4
Computer physician order entry: benefits, costs, and issues.
Ann Intern Med. 2003 Jul 1;139(1):31-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-1-200307010-00010.
5
Adverse drug event trigger tool: a practical methodology for measuring medication related harm.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Jun;12(3):194-200. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.3.194.
7
Medication errors and adverse drug events in pediatric inpatients.
JAMA. 2001 Apr 25;285(16):2114-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.16.2114.
10
A computer-assisted management program for antibiotics and other antiinfective agents.
N Engl J Med. 1998 Jan 22;338(4):232-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199801223380406.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验