Suppr超能文献

实施前的药物临床决策支持系统的跨专业评估。

Interprofessional Evaluation of a Medication Clinical Decision Support System Prior to Implementation.

机构信息

Pharmacy Department, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen and Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.

Medical Center for Information and Communication Technology (MIK), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen and Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.

出版信息

Appl Clin Inform. 2024 May;15(3):637-649. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1787184. Epub 2024 Jul 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Computerized physician order entry (CPOE) and clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are widespread due to increasing digitalization of hospitals. They can be associated with reduced medication errors and improved patient safety, but also with well-known risks (e.g., overalerting, nonadoption).

OBJECTIVES

Therefore, we aimed to evaluate a commonly used CDSS containing Medication-Safety-Validators (e.g., drug-drug interactions), which can be locally activated or deactivated, to identify limitations and thereby potentially optimize the use of the CDSS in clinical routine.

METHODS

Within the implementation process of Meona (commercial CPOE/CDSS) at a German University hospital, we conducted an interprofessional evaluation of the CDSS and its included Medication-Safety-Validators following a defined algorithm: (1) general evaluation, (2) systematic technical and content-related validation, (3) decision of activation or deactivation, and possibly (4) choosing the activation mode (interruptive or passive). We completed the in-depth evaluation for exemplarily chosen Medication-Safety-Validators. Moreover, we performed a survey among 12 German University hospitals using Meona to compare their configurations.

RESULTS

Based on the evaluation, we deactivated 3 of 10 Medication-Safety-Validators due to technical or content-related limitations. For the seven activated Medication-Safety-Validators, we chose the interruptive option ["PUSH-(&PULL)-modus"] four times (4/7), and a new, on-demand option ["only-PULL-modus"] three times (3/7). The site-specific configuration (activation or deactivation) differed across all participating hospitals in the survey and led to varying medication safety alerts for identical patient cases.

CONCLUSION

An interprofessional evaluation of CPOE and CDSS prior to implementation in clinical routine is crucial to detect limitations. This can contribute to a sustainable utilization and thereby possibly increase medication safety.

摘要

背景

随着医院数字化程度的提高,计算机化医嘱录入(CPOE)和临床决策支持系统(CDSS)已经得到广泛应用。它们可以减少用药错误,提高患者安全性,但也存在众所周知的风险(例如,过度报警,不采用)。

目的

因此,我们旨在评估一种常用的包含药物安全验证器(例如药物相互作用)的 CDSS,该验证器可以在本地激活或停用,以识别限制因素,从而有可能优化 CDSS 在临床常规中的使用。

方法

在德国一所大学医院实施 Meona(商业 CPOE/CDSS)的过程中,我们按照定义的算法对 CDSS 及其包含的药物安全验证器进行了跨专业评估:(1)总体评估,(2)系统技术和内容相关验证,(3)激活或停用决策,以及可能的(4)选择激活模式(中断或被动)。我们对示例性选择的药物安全验证器进行了深入评估。此外,我们对使用 Meona 的 12 家德国大学医院进行了调查,以比较他们的配置。

结果

基于评估,我们由于技术或内容相关的限制而停用了 10 个药物安全验证器中的 3 个。对于激活的 7 个药物安全验证器,我们选择了中断选项[“PUSH-(&PULL)-模式”]四次(4/7),并选择了新的按需选项[“仅 PULL-模式”]三次(3/7)。调查中的所有参与医院的特定站点配置(激活或停用)都不同,导致相同患者病例的药物安全警报不同。

结论

在临床常规实施之前对 CPOE 和 CDSS 进行跨专业评估对于检测限制至关重要。这有助于可持续利用,从而可能提高用药安全性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/223a/11290949/22def4b397cc/10-1055-s-0044-1787184-i202312ra0294-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验