Suppr超能文献

电子医嘱录入系统(CPOE/CDSS)在住院患者中的成本效益分析。

Cost-effectiveness of an electronic medication ordering system (CPOE/CDSS) in hospitalized patients.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 2014 Aug;83(8):572-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 May 23.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Prescribing medication is an important aspect of almost all in-hospital treatment regimes. Besides their obviously beneficial effects, medicines can also cause adverse drug events (ADE), which increase morbidity, mortality and health care costs. Partially, these ADEs arise from medication errors, e.g. at the prescribing stage. ADEs caused by medication errors are preventable ADEs. Until now, medication ordering was primarily a paper-based process and consequently, it was error prone. Computerized Physician Order Entry, combined with basic Clinical Decision Support System (CPOE/CDSS) is considered to enhance patient safety. Limited information is available on the balance between the health gains and the costs that need to be invested in order to achieve these positive effects. Aim of this study was to study the balance between the effects and costs of CPOE/CDSS compared to the traditional paper-based medication ordering.

METHODS

The economic evaluation was performed alongside a clinical study (interrupted time series design) on the effectiveness of CPOE/CDSS, including a cost minimization and a cost-effectiveness analysis. Data collection took place between 2005 and 2008. Analyses were performed from a hospital perspective. The study was performed in a general teaching hospital and a University Medical Centre on general internal medicine, gastroenterology and geriatric wards. Computerized Physician Order Entry, combined with basic Clinical Decision Support System (CPOE/CDSS) was compared to a traditional paper based system. All costs of both medication ordering systems are based on resources used and time invested. Prices were expressed in Euros (price level 2009). Effectiveness outcomes were medication errors and preventable adverse drug events.

RESULTS

During the paper-based prescribing period 592 patients were included, and during the CPOE/CDSS period 603. Total costs of the paper-based system and CPOE/CDSS amounted to €12.37 and €14.91 per patient/day respectively. The Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) for medication errors was 3.54 and for preventable adverse drug events 322.70, indicating the extra amount (€) that has to be invested in order to prevent one medication error or one pADE.

CONCLUSIONS

CPOE with basic CDSS contributes to a decreased risk of preventable harm. Overall, the extra costs of CPOE/CDSS needed to prevent one ME or one pADE seem to be acceptable.

摘要

简介

开处方是几乎所有住院治疗方案的重要组成部分。除了明显的有益效果外,药物还可能引起不良药物事件(ADE),从而增加发病率、死亡率和医疗保健成本。这些 ADE 部分源于用药错误,例如在开处方阶段。由用药错误引起的 ADE 是可预防的 ADE。到目前为止,用药医嘱主要是纸质流程,因此容易出错。计算机化医生医嘱输入,结合基本临床决策支持系统(CPOE/CDSS)被认为可以提高患者安全性。关于为实现这些积极效果而需要投资的健康收益和成本之间的平衡,可用的信息有限。本研究的目的是研究 CPOE/CDSS 与传统纸质用药医嘱相比在效果和成本之间的平衡。

方法

该经济评估是在 CPOE/CDSS 有效性的临床研究(中断时间序列设计)中进行的,包括成本最小化和成本效益分析。数据收集于 2005 年至 2008 年进行。分析从医院角度进行。该研究在一家综合教学医院和一家大学医学中心的普通内科、胃肠科和老年科病房进行。计算机化医生医嘱输入,结合基本临床决策支持系统(CPOE/CDSS)与传统纸质系统进行比较。两种用药医嘱系统的所有成本均基于使用的资源和投入的时间。价格以欧元表示(2009 年价格水平)。有效性结果为用药错误和可预防的药物不良事件。

结果

在基于纸质的医嘱阶段纳入了 592 名患者,而在 CPOE/CDSS 阶段纳入了 603 名患者。基于纸质的系统和 CPOE/CDSS 的总费用分别为每位患者每天 12.37 欧元和 14.91 欧元。用药错误的增量成本效益比(ICER)为 3.54,可预防的药物不良事件为 322.70,这表明为预防一个用药错误或一个 pADE 需要额外投入的金额(欧元)。

结论

CPOE 结合基本 CDSS 有助于降低预防伤害的风险。总体而言,预防一个 ME 或一个 pADE 所需的 CPOE/CDSS 的额外成本似乎是可以接受的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验