Suppr超能文献

使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版》物质与精神障碍的精神病学研究访谈对物质使用者共病精神障碍的诊断。

Diagnosis of comorbid psychiatric disorders in substance users assessed with the Psychiatric Research Interview for Substance and Mental Disorders for DSM-IV.

作者信息

Hasin Deborah, Samet Sharon, Nunes Edward, Meydan Jakob, Matseoane Karen, Waxman Rachel

机构信息

Columbia University/New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Dr., Box 123, New York, NY 10032, USA.

出版信息

Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Apr;163(4):689-96. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.4.689.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The authors used the Psychiatric Research Interview for Substance and Mental Disorders for DSM-IV (PRISM-IV) to test the reliability of DSM-IV-defined disorders, including primary and substance-induced disorders, in substance-abusing subjects.

METHOD

Substance-abusing patients (N=285) from substance abuse/dual-diagnosis treatment settings and mental health treatment settings participated in test and blind retest interviews with the PRISM-IV, which includes specific guidelines for assessment of substance abusers.

RESULTS

Kappas for primary and substance-induced major depressive disorder ranged from 0.66 to 0.75. Reliability for psychotic disorders, eating disorders, antisocial personality disorder, and borderline personality disorder was in the same range. Reliability for most anxiety disorders was lower. Reliability was good to excellent (kappas >/=0.65) for most substance dependence disorders. Continuous measures (severity, age at onset) had intraclass correlation coefficients >0.70 with few exceptions. Reliability was better for primary than for substance-induced disorders, although not greatly so.

CONCLUSION

Most DSM-IV psychiatric disorders can be assessed in substance-abusing subjects with acceptable to excellent reliability by using specifically designed procedures. Good reliability improves the likelihood of significant study results.

摘要

目的

作者使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版物质与精神障碍的精神病学研究访谈(PRISM-IV),来测试物质滥用受试者中《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版定义的障碍(包括原发性和物质所致障碍)的可靠性。

方法

来自物质滥用/双重诊断治疗机构和心理健康治疗机构的物质滥用患者(N = 285)参与了PRISM-IV的测试和盲法重测访谈,该访谈包括评估物质滥用者的具体指南。

结果

原发性和物质所致重度抑郁症的卡帕值范围为0.66至0.75。精神障碍、进食障碍、反社会人格障碍和边缘型人格障碍的可靠性处于同一范围。大多数焦虑症的可靠性较低。大多数物质依赖障碍的可靠性良好至优秀(卡帕值≥0.65)。连续测量(严重程度、发病年龄)的组内相关系数除少数例外均>0.70。原发性障碍的可靠性优于物质所致障碍,尽管差异不大。

结论

通过使用专门设计的程序,大多数《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版的精神障碍在物质滥用受试者中能够以可接受至优秀的可靠性进行评估。良好的可靠性提高了获得显著研究结果的可能性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验