Walker F Ann
Department of Chemistry, The University of Arizona, PO Box 210041, Tucson, AZ 85721-0041, USA.
J Biol Inorg Chem. 2006 Jun;11(4):391-7. doi: 10.1007/s00775-006-0095-8. Epub 2006 Apr 4.
The 1H NMR chemical shifts of the heme methyl groups of the ferriheme complex of metneuroglobin (Du et al. in J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125:8080-8081, 2003) predict orientations of the axial histidine ligands (Shokhirev and Walker in J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 3:581-594, 1998) that are not consistent with the X-ray data (Vallone et al. in Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinf. 56:85-94, 2004), and the EPR spectrum (Vinck et al. in J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126:4516-4517, 2004) is only marginally consistent with these data. The reasons for these inconsistencies appear to be rooted in the high degree of aqueous solution exposure of the heme group and the fact that there are no strong hydrogen-bond acceptors for the histidine imidazole N-H protons provided by the protein. Similar inconsistencies may exist for other water-soluble heme proteins, and 1H NMR spectroscopy provides a simple means to verify whether the solution structure of the heme center is the same as or different from that in the crystalline state.
高铁神经球蛋白的高铁血红素复合物的血红素甲基基团的1H NMR化学位移(Du等人,《美国化学会志》,2003年,第125卷,第8080 - 8081页)预测了轴向组氨酸配体的取向(Shokhirev和Walker,《生物无机化学杂志》,1998年,第3卷,第581 - 594页),但这些取向与X射线数据(Vallone等人,《蛋白质结构、功能与生物信息学》,2004年,第56卷,第85 - 94页)不一致,并且电子顺磁共振光谱(Vinck等人,《美国化学会志》,2004年,第126卷,第4516 - 4517页)仅与这些数据勉强相符。这些不一致的原因似乎源于血红素基团在水溶液中的高度暴露以及蛋白质没有为组氨酸咪唑N - H质子提供强氢键受体这一事实。其他水溶性血红素蛋白可能也存在类似的不一致情况,并且1H NMR光谱提供了一种简单的方法来验证血红素中心的溶液结构与晶体状态下的结构是否相同。