Suppr超能文献

[护理专业人员强化烟草咨询项目的效果]

[Effectiveness of a programme of intensive tobacco counselling by nursing professionals].

作者信息

Sanz-Pozo B, de Miguel-Díez J, Anegon-Blanco M, García-Carballo M, Gómez-Suárez E, Fernández-Domínguez J F

机构信息

Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Centro de Salud El Greco, Getafe, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Aten Primaria. 2006 Mar 31;37(5):266-72. doi: 10.1157/13086312.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of a systematic intensive tobacco counselling programme conducted by nursing professionals.

DESIGN

Randomised clinical trial with control.

SETTING

Primary care nursing and medical consultations.

PARTICIPANTS

Smokers requesting help in our centre's medical clinics during the recruitment period, up to the sample size required (125). Inclusion criteria were: aged between 18 and 70, people who smoked during the preceding month any number of cigarettes a day, and a score over 7 on the Richmond test.

INTERVENTIONS

The patients recruited were randomised, according to the clinic from which they came, to the group that received brief counselling from the doctor (control group) or to the group that received brief counselling plus nursing follow-up (intervention group). Follow-up visits were programmed in this latter group for up to 3 months after giving up smoking.

MAIN MEASUREMENTS

Abstinence at 12 and 24 months.

RESULTS

The effectiveness of the intervention considered as the rate of abstinence at 12 months was 13.8% (95% CI, 6.5-24.7) in the control group and 6.7% (95% CI, 1.8-16.2) in the intervention group, with no significant differences between the two.

CONCLUSIONS

In smokers seen in primary care, the effectiveness of a programme of intensive tobacco counselling by nursing staff is no more effective than the doctor's brief, one-off counselling. Brief counselling has a better cost-effectiveness relationship than intensive counselling.

摘要

目的

确定由护理专业人员开展的系统性强化烟草咨询项目的效果。

设计

有对照的随机临床试验。

地点

基层医疗护理及医疗咨询。

参与者

在招募期间,在我们中心医疗诊所寻求帮助的吸烟者,直至达到所需样本量(125名)。纳入标准为:年龄在18至70岁之间,前一个月每天吸食任意数量香烟,且里士满测试得分超过7分。

干预措施

根据招募患者来自的诊所,将其随机分为接受医生简短咨询的组(对照组)或接受简短咨询加护理随访的组(干预组)。在干预组中,戒烟后安排长达3个月的随访就诊。

主要测量指标

12个月和24个月时的戒烟情况。

结果

对照组12个月时的戒烟率即干预效果为13.8%(95%置信区间,6.5 - 24.7),干预组为6.7%(95%置信区间,1.8 - 16.2),两组之间无显著差异。

结论

在基层医疗中见到的吸烟者中,护理人员强化烟草咨询项目的效果并不比医生的简短一次性咨询更有效。简短咨询比强化咨询具有更好的成本效益关系。

相似文献

1
[Effectiveness of a programme of intensive tobacco counselling by nursing professionals].
Aten Primaria. 2006 Mar 31;37(5):266-72. doi: 10.1157/13086312.
2
[Effectiveness of non-pharmacological primary care methods for giving up tobacco dependency].
Aten Primaria. 2003 Oct 15;32(6):366-70. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(03)79298-1.
3
Group behaviour therapy programmes for smoking cessation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(3):CD001007. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001007.
4
Interventions for smoking cessation in hospitalised patients.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18(3):CD001837. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001837.pub2.
5
Telephone counselling for smoking cessation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 12(8):CD002850. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002850.pub3.
6
Group behaviour therapy programmes for smoking cessation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18(2):CD001007. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001007.pub2.
8
Nursing interventions for smoking cessation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 12(8):CD001188. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001188.pub4.
9
Nursing interventions for smoking cessation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23(1):CD001188. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001188.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of general practice nurses in supporting people to quit smoking: A qualitative study.
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 18;19(7):e0306555. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306555. eCollection 2024.
2
Strategies to improve smoking cessation rates in primary care.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD011556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011556.pub2.
3
Nursing interventions for smoking cessation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 15;12(12):CD001188. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001188.pub5.
4
Individual behavioural counselling for smoking cessation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 31;3(3):CD001292. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001292.pub3.
5
Physician advice for smoking cessation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 May 31;2013(5):CD000165. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000165.pub4.

本文引用的文献

1
Estimates of global mortality attributable to smoking in 2000.
Lancet. 2003 Sep 13;362(9387):847-52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14338-3.
2
[Clinical intervention in smoking. Are specific primary health-care centers needed?].
Med Clin (Barc). 2002 Oct 26;119(14):541-9. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7753(02)73488-x.
4
[Effectiveness of a group therapy intervention to quit smoking. Randomized clinical trial].
Med Clin (Barc). 2002 Jun 15;119(2):53-7. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7753(02)73312-5.
5
Nursing interventions for smoking cessation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(3):CD001188. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001188.
6
Smoking cessation guidelines for health professionals: an update. Health Education Authority.
Thorax. 2000 Dec;55(12):987-99. doi: 10.1136/thorax.55.12.987.
9
Smoking cessation: evidence based recommendations for the healthcare system.
BMJ. 1999 Jan 16;318(7177):182-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7177.182.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验