Sanz-Pozo B, de Miguel-Díez J, Anegon-Blanco M, García-Carballo M, Gómez-Suárez E, Fernández-Domínguez J F
Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Centro de Salud El Greco, Getafe, Madrid, Spain.
Aten Primaria. 2006 Mar 31;37(5):266-72. doi: 10.1157/13086312.
To determine the effectiveness of a systematic intensive tobacco counselling programme conducted by nursing professionals.
Randomised clinical trial with control.
Primary care nursing and medical consultations.
Smokers requesting help in our centre's medical clinics during the recruitment period, up to the sample size required (125). Inclusion criteria were: aged between 18 and 70, people who smoked during the preceding month any number of cigarettes a day, and a score over 7 on the Richmond test.
The patients recruited were randomised, according to the clinic from which they came, to the group that received brief counselling from the doctor (control group) or to the group that received brief counselling plus nursing follow-up (intervention group). Follow-up visits were programmed in this latter group for up to 3 months after giving up smoking.
Abstinence at 12 and 24 months.
The effectiveness of the intervention considered as the rate of abstinence at 12 months was 13.8% (95% CI, 6.5-24.7) in the control group and 6.7% (95% CI, 1.8-16.2) in the intervention group, with no significant differences between the two.
In smokers seen in primary care, the effectiveness of a programme of intensive tobacco counselling by nursing staff is no more effective than the doctor's brief, one-off counselling. Brief counselling has a better cost-effectiveness relationship than intensive counselling.
确定由护理专业人员开展的系统性强化烟草咨询项目的效果。
有对照的随机临床试验。
基层医疗护理及医疗咨询。
在招募期间,在我们中心医疗诊所寻求帮助的吸烟者,直至达到所需样本量(125名)。纳入标准为:年龄在18至70岁之间,前一个月每天吸食任意数量香烟,且里士满测试得分超过7分。
根据招募患者来自的诊所,将其随机分为接受医生简短咨询的组(对照组)或接受简短咨询加护理随访的组(干预组)。在干预组中,戒烟后安排长达3个月的随访就诊。
12个月和24个月时的戒烟情况。
对照组12个月时的戒烟率即干预效果为13.8%(95%置信区间,6.5 - 24.7),干预组为6.7%(95%置信区间,1.8 - 16.2),两组之间无显著差异。
在基层医疗中见到的吸烟者中,护理人员强化烟草咨询项目的效果并不比医生的简短一次性咨询更有效。简短咨询比强化咨询具有更好的成本效益关系。