Stuyt Elizabeth B, Sajbel Terrie A, Allen Michael H
Circle Program at Colorado Mental Health Institute at Pueblo (CMHIP), Pueblo, Colorado 81003, USA.
Am J Addict. 2006 Mar-Apr;15(2):166-73. doi: 10.1080/10550490500528613.
This retrospective study of patients treated in a ninety-day, inpatient, dual-diagnosis treatment program examined antipsychotic effectiveness in this population using length of stay in treatment and successful program completion as outcome measures. All patients with co-occurring substance dependence and schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder treated with olanzapine, risperidone, ziprasidone, and typical depot neuroleptics from January 2001 to December 2003 (N = 55) are the subjects of this study. Patients stayed longer in treatment when taking risperidone (82 +/- 19 days) or ziprasidone (74 +/- 21 days) compared with olanzapine (44 +/- 30 days) or typicals (47 +/- 36 days). Eighty-eight percent of risperidone patients and 64% of ziprasidone patients successfully completed the program, while only 33% of olanzapine patients and 40% of patients on typicals successfully completed the program. Risperidone and ziprasidone were associated with significantly better program performance than olanzapine or depot typicals in this population. Possible reasons for this difference are discussed.
这项针对在为期90天的住院双重诊断治疗项目中接受治疗的患者的回顾性研究,以治疗停留时间和项目成功完成为结果指标,考察了该人群中抗精神病药物的疗效。2001年1月至2003年12月期间,所有同时患有物质依赖和精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍且接受奥氮平、利培酮、齐拉西酮和典型长效抗精神病药物治疗的患者(N = 55)均为本研究对象。与服用奥氮平(44 ± 30天)或典型长效抗精神病药物(47 ± 36天)相比,服用利培酮(82 ± 19天)或齐拉西酮(74 ± 21天)的患者在治疗中停留的时间更长。88%服用利培酮的患者和64%服用齐拉西酮的患者成功完成了项目,而服用奥氮平的患者中只有33%,服用典型长效抗精神病药物的患者中只有40%成功完成了项目。在该人群中,利培酮和齐拉西酮与比奥氮平或长效典型抗精神病药物显著更好的项目表现相关。文中讨论了造成这种差异的可能原因。