• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床病史能否区分器质性消化不良和功能性消化不良?

Can the clinical history distinguish between organic and functional dyspepsia?

作者信息

Moayyedi Paul, Talley Nicholas J, Fennerty M Brian, Vakil Nimish

机构信息

Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

JAMA. 2006 Apr 5;295(13):1566-76. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.13.1566.

DOI:10.1001/jama.295.13.1566
PMID:16595759
Abstract

CONTEXT

Upper gastrointestinal symptoms occur in 40% of the population. An accurate diagnosis would help rationalize investigation and treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the literature of the accuracy of primary care physicians, gastroenterologists, or computer models in diagnosing organic dyspepsia.

DATA SOURCES

A search of Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (December 2003), MEDLINE (1966-December 2003), EMBASE (1988-December 2003), and CINAHL (1982-December 2003) for studies that reported on cohorts of patients attending for endoscopy that had symptoms, clinical opinion, or both recorded before investigation.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies that prospectively compared the diagnosis reached by a clinician, computer model, or both with results of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in adult patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two authors independently assessed studies (n = 79) for eligibility and abstracted data for estimating likelihood ratios (LRs) of clinical opinion, computer models, or both in diagnosing an organic cause for dyspepsia.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Fifteen studies were identified that evaluated 11 366 patients, with 4817 patients (42%) classified as having organic dyspepsia. The computer models performed similarly to the clinician; therefore, the 2 approaches were combined. The diagnosis reached by the clinician or computer model suggesting organic dyspepsia had an LR of 1.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-1.8), and a negative result decreased the likelihood of organic dyspepsia (LR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.38-0.55). A diagnosis of peptic ulcer disease performed similarly with an LR of 2.2 (95% CI, 1.9-2.6), but an evaluation that suggested the absence of peptic ulcer disease had an LR of 0.45 (95% CI, 0.38-0.53). A clinical history suggesting esophagitis had an LR of 2.4 (95% CI, 1.9-3.0) vs a negative history that had an LR of 0.50 (95% CI, 0.42-0.60).

CONCLUSION

Neither clinical impression nor computer models that incorporated patient demographics, risk factors, history items, and symptoms adequately distinguished between organic and functional disease in patients referred for endoscopic evaluation of dyspepsia.

摘要

背景

40%的人群存在上消化道症状。准确的诊断有助于使检查和治疗更加合理。

目的

系统回顾关于初级保健医生、胃肠病学家或计算机模型诊断器质性消化不良准确性的文献。

资料来源

检索考克兰对照试验注册库(2003年12月)、医学索引数据库(1966年至2003年12月)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(1988年至2003年12月)和护理学与健康领域数据库(1982年至2003年12月),查找报告了有症状、临床意见或二者均在检查前记录的接受内镜检查患者队列的研究。

研究选择

前瞻性比较临床医生、计算机模型或二者得出的诊断与有上消化道症状成年患者上消化道内镜检查结果的研究。

资料提取

两位作者独立评估研究(n = 79)的合格性,并提取数据以估计临床意见、计算机模型或二者诊断消化不良器质性病因的似然比(LRs)。

资料综合

确定了15项研究,共评估11366例患者,其中4817例患者(42%)被分类为患有器质性消化不良。计算机模型的表现与临床医生相似;因此,将这两种方法合并。临床医生或计算机模型得出的提示器质性消化不良的诊断的似然比为1.6(95%置信区间[CI],1.4 - 1.8),阴性结果降低了器质性消化不良的可能性(似然比,0.46;95% CI,0.38 - 0.55)。消化性溃疡病的诊断表现相似,似然比为2.2(95% CI,1.9 - 2.6),但提示无消化性溃疡病的评估的似然比为0.45(95% CI,0.38 - 0.53)。提示食管炎的临床病史的似然比为2.4(95% CI,1.9 - 3.0),而阴性病史的似然比为0.50(95% CI,0.42 - 0.60)。

结论

对于因消化不良接受内镜评估的患者,临床印象和纳入患者人口统计学、危险因素、病史项目及症状的计算机模型均不能充分区分器质性疾病和功能性疾病。

相似文献

1
Can the clinical history distinguish between organic and functional dyspepsia?临床病史能否区分器质性消化不良和功能性消化不良?
JAMA. 2006 Apr 5;295(13):1566-76. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.13.1566.
2
Will the history and physical examination help establish that irritable bowel syndrome is causing this patient's lower gastrointestinal tract symptoms?病史和体格检查有助于确定肠易激综合征是否是导致该患者下消化道症状的原因吗?
JAMA. 2008 Oct 15;300(15):1793-805. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.15.1793.
3
Symptom criteria do not distinguish between functional and organic dyspepsia.症状标准无法区分功能性消化不良和器质性消化不良。
Eur J Surg. 1998 May;164(5):345-52. doi: 10.1080/110241598750004373.
4
Value of the unaided clinical diagnosis in dyspeptic patients in primary care.基层医疗中消化不良患者的临床初步诊断价值。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 May;96(5):1417-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03775.x.
5
Discriminant value of symptoms in patients with dyspepsia.消化不良患者症状的判别值。
J Fam Pract. 1994 Feb;38(2):139-43.
6
[Endoscopic and histopathological findings of the upper gastrointestinal tract in patients with functional and organic dyspepsia].[功能性和器质性消化不良患者上消化道的内镜及组织病理学表现]
Przegl Lek. 2014;71(4):204-9.
7
The predictive value of history in dyspepsia.消化不良病史的预测价值。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1990 Jul;25(7):689-97. doi: 10.3109/00365529008997594.
8
The Rome III criteria for the diagnosis of functional dyspepsia in secondary care are not superior to previous definitions.罗马 III 标准在二级医疗保健中对功能性消化不良的诊断并不优于以往的定义。
Gastroenterology. 2014 Apr;146(4):932-40; quiz e14-5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.01.014. Epub 2014 Jan 11.
9
GPs' ability to diagnose dyspepsia based only on physical examination and patient history.全科医生仅通过体格检查和患者病史来诊断消化不良的能力。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2000 Jun;18(2):99-104. doi: 10.1080/028134300750018981.
10
Appropriateness of referrals for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.上消化道内镜检查转诊的适宜性
West Afr J Med. 2011 Sep-Oct;30(5):342-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Drug treatment strategies for erosive esophagitis in adults: a narrative review.成人糜烂性食管炎的药物治疗策略:叙述性综述
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Jul 23;10:54. doi: 10.21037/tgh-24-168. eCollection 2025.
2
Point-of-Care Diagnosis of Atrophic Gastritis by Serological Biomarker Test (GastroPanel Quick Test) in Gastroscopy Referral Patients in India.印度胃镜转诊患者中通过血清生物标志物检测(胃功能三项快速检测)进行萎缩性胃炎的即时诊断
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 25;14(3):787. doi: 10.3390/jcm14030787.
3
Endoscopic diagnosis of gastric and oesophageal cancer in Lusaka, Zambia: a retrospective analysis.
赞比亚卢萨卡地区胃食管癌的内镜诊断:回顾性分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Apr 1;24(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03187-x.
4
Global prevalence of functional dyspepsia according to Rome criteria, 1990-2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis.根据罗马标准,2019-2020 年全球功能性消化不良的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 20;14(1):4172. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54716-3.
5
The Disease Spectrum and Natural History of Patients With Abdominal Bloating or Distension: A Longitudinal Study.腹胀或腹部膨隆患者的疾病谱与自然史:一项纵向研究
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2024 Jan 30;30(1):64-72. doi: 10.5056/jnm22197.
6
Diagnostic Tests Used in Europe: Results of over 34,000 Patients from the European Registry on Management.欧洲使用的诊断测试:来自欧洲管理登记处的34000多名患者的结果。
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 28;12(13):4363. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134363.
7
Dyspepsia with alarm symptoms in patients aged less than 60 years: Is upper gastrointestinal endoscopy justified in Indian scenario?年龄小于 60 岁的伴报警症状消化不良患者:在印度情况下行上消化道内镜检查是否合理?
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2022 Oct;41(5):430-439. doi: 10.1007/s12664-022-01275-y. Epub 2022 Oct 29.
8
British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the management of functional dyspepsia.英国胃肠病学会功能性消化不良管理指南。
Gut. 2022 Sep;71(9):1697-1723. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327737. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
9
Real-world prevalence of endoscopic findings in patients with gastroesophageal reflux symptoms: a cross-sectional study.胃食管反流症状患者内镜检查结果的真实世界患病率:一项横断面研究。
Endosc Int Open. 2022 Apr 14;10(4):E342-E346. doi: 10.1055/a-1756-4594. eCollection 2022 Apr.
10
Beyond the Eckardt Score: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures in Esophageal Disorders.超越 Eckardt 评分:食管疾病的患者报告结局测量。
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2021 Dec 1;23(12):29. doi: 10.1007/s11894-021-00831-4.