Dansranjavin Temuujin, Möbius Christian, Tannapfel Andrea, Bartels Michael, Wittekind Christian, Hauss Johan, Witzigmann Helmut
Department of Surgery, University of Leipzig, Liebigstr 20a, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Oncol Rep. 2006 May;15(5):1125-31.
E-cadherin and DAP kinase have been implicated as 'invasion suppressor' genes in human cancer. The aim of this study was to analyze the methylation status of E-cadherin and DAP kinase and the expression of the protein in the metastatic lesions and to compare it with the expression in the primary tumor. Methylation-specific PCR of the DAP kinase and E-cadherin promoter was performed in 28 primary adenocarcinomas of the pancreas and in 13 corresponding regional lymph node metastases. The presence of E-cadherin and DAP kinase protein was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Metastatic lymph nodes showed a significant different expression profile from the primary tumor. E-cadherin methylation was observed in 8/28 (29%) and loss of protein expression was observed in 16/28 (57%) of pancreatic carcinomas. E-cadherin methylation was observed in 7/13 (54%) and loss of protein expression was observed in 11/13 (85%) lymph node metastases (p=0.047). DAP kinase methylation occurred in 11/28 (39%) pancreatic carcinomas and loss of protein expression was observed in 13/28 (46%). DAP kinase was methylated in 6/13 (46%) lymph node meta-stases and loss of protein expression was observed in 10/13 (77%) (p=0.039). Comparing primary tumor and corresponding lymph node metastases in 13 cases, the status of E-cadherin methylation was discordant in 2 cases. The protein expression pattern of E-cadherin and DAP kinase was discordant in 4 and 3 cases respectively. Unmethylated tumor samples did not express E-cadherin in 12 and DAP kinase protein in 6 cases. Our results demonstrate that reduction of E-cadherin and DAP kinase expression is more frequent in lymph node metastases than in the primary tumor and methylation of the promoter region contributes to this reduction; however, an alternative mechanism of inactivation seems to exist.
E-钙黏蛋白和DAP激酶被认为是人类癌症中的“侵袭抑制”基因。本研究的目的是分析E-钙黏蛋白和DAP激酶的甲基化状态以及蛋白在转移病灶中的表达,并将其与原发性肿瘤中的表达进行比较。对28例胰腺原发性腺癌及其13例相应区域淋巴结转移灶进行了DAP激酶和E-钙黏蛋白启动子的甲基化特异性PCR检测。通过免疫组织化学评估E-钙黏蛋白和DAP激酶蛋白的存在情况。转移淋巴结与原发性肿瘤表现出显著不同的表达谱。在28例胰腺癌中,8例(29%)观察到E-钙黏蛋白甲基化,16例(57%)观察到蛋白表达缺失。在13例淋巴结转移灶中,7例(54%)观察到E-钙黏蛋白甲基化,11例(85%)观察到蛋白表达缺失(p=0.047)。11例(39%)胰腺癌发生DAP激酶甲基化,13例(46%)观察到蛋白表达缺失。6例(46%)淋巴结转移灶中DAP激酶发生甲基化,10例(77%)观察到蛋白表达缺失(p=0.039)。比较13例原发性肿瘤和相应淋巴结转移灶,2例E-钙黏蛋白甲基化状态不一致。E-钙黏蛋白和DAP激酶的蛋白表达模式分别在4例和3例中不一致。未甲基化的肿瘤样本中,12例未表达E-钙黏蛋白,6例未表达DAP激酶蛋白。我们的结果表明,与原发性肿瘤相比,淋巴结转移灶中E-钙黏蛋白和DAP激酶表达的降低更为常见,启动子区域的甲基化促成了这种降低;然而,似乎存在另一种失活机制。