O'Brien Beth A, Mansfield J Stephen, Legge Gordon E
Eliot-Pearson Department of Child Development, Tufts University, USA.
J Res Read. 2005 Aug;28(3):332-349. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2005.00273.x.
This article details a study which predicted that across a wide range of print sizes dyslexic reading would follow the same curve shape as skilled reading, with constant reading rates across large print sizes and a sharp decline in reading rates below a critical print size. It also predicted that dyslexic readers would require larger critical print sizes to attain their maximum reading speeds, following the letter position coding deficit hypothesis. Reading speed was measured across twelve print sizes ranging from Snellen equivalents of 20/12 to 20/200 letter sizes for a group of dyslexic readers in Grades 2 to 4 (aged 7 to 10 years), and for non-dyslexic readers in Grades 1 to 3 (aged 6 to 8 years). The groups were equated for word reading ability. Results confirmed that reading rate-by-print size curves followed the same two-limbed shape for dyslexic and non-dyslexic readers. Dyslexic reading curves showed higher critical print sizes and shallower reading rate-by-print size slopes below the critical print size, consistent with the hypothesis of a letter-position coding deficit. Non-dyslexic reading curves also showed a decrease of critical print size with age. A developmental lag model of dyslexic reading does not account for the results, since the regression of critical print size on maximum reading rate differed between groups.
本文详细介绍了一项研究,该研究预测,在各种印刷字体大小范围内,诵读困难者的阅读曲线形状将与熟练阅读者相同,即在较大印刷字体大小下阅读速度保持恒定,而在低于临界印刷字体大小时阅读速度急剧下降。研究还预测,根据字母位置编码缺陷假说,诵读困难的读者需要更大的临界印刷字体大小才能达到其最大阅读速度。研究测量了一组二至四年级(7至10岁)的诵读困难读者以及一至三年级(6至8岁)的非诵读困难读者在12种印刷字体大小下的阅读速度,这些字体大小相当于斯内伦视力表中从20/12到20/200的字母大小。两组在单词阅读能力方面相当。结果证实,诵读困难读者和非诵读困难读者的阅读速度与印刷字体大小的曲线呈现相同的双分支形状。诵读困难读者的阅读曲线显示出更高的临界印刷字体大小,并且在临界印刷字体大小以下,阅读速度与印刷字体大小的斜率更平缓,这与字母位置编码缺陷假说一致。非诵读困难读者的阅读曲线也显示出临界印刷字体大小随年龄减小。诵读困难阅读的发育滞后模型无法解释这些结果,因为两组中临界印刷字体大小对最大阅读速度的回归有所不同。