Chin C E, Ledesma H M, Cirino P T, Sevcik R A, Morris R D, Frijters J C, Lovett M W
Georgia State University, Atlanta 30303, USA.
J Learn Disabil. 2001 Jan-Feb;34(1):2-8. doi: 10.1177/002221940103400101.
Concurrent validity of the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (K-BIT) with the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition (WISC-III) was evaluated, as well as the K-BIT's accuracy as a predictor of WISC-III scores, in a sample of young children with reading disabilities. The two measures were administered to 65 children from Atlanta, Boston, and Toronto who ranged from 6-5 to 7-11 years of age at testing. Correlations between the verbal, nonverbal, and composite scales of the K-BIT and WISC-III were .60, .48, and .63, respectively. Mean K-BIT scores ranged from 1.2 to 5.0 points higher than the corresponding WISC-III scores. Standard errors of estimation ranged from 10.0 to 12.3 points. In individual cases, K-BIT scores can underestimate or overestimate WISC-III scores by as much as 25 points. Results suggest caution against using the K-BIT exclusively for placement and diagnostic purposes with young children with reading disabilities if IQ scores are required.
在一个有阅读障碍的幼儿样本中,对考夫曼简短智力测验(K-BIT)与韦氏儿童智力量表第三版(WISC-III)的同时效度,以及K-BIT作为WISC-III分数预测指标的准确性进行了评估。对来自亚特兰大、波士顿和多伦多的65名儿童进行了这两项测试,测试时他们的年龄在6岁5个月至7岁11个月之间。K-BIT的言语、非言语和综合量表与WISC-III之间的相关性分别为0.60、0.48和0.63。K-BIT的平均分数比相应的WISC-III分数高1.2至5.0分。估计标准误差在10.0至12.3分之间。在个别情况下,K-BIT分数可能会低估或高估WISC-III分数多达25分。结果表明,如果需要智商分数,那么在对有阅读障碍的幼儿进行安置和诊断时,要谨慎使用K-BIT。