Toyonaga Takayuki, Matsushima Makoto, Tanaka Yoshiaki, Shimojima Yasuhiro, Matsumura Naomi, Kannyama Hiroki, Nozawa Makiko, Hatakeyama Tomoaki, Suzuki Kazunori, Yanagita Kenzo, Tanaka Masao
Department of Surgery, Matsushima Hospital Colo-Proctology Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007 Feb;22(2):209-13. doi: 10.1007/s00384-006-0121-x. Epub 2006 Apr 7.
Treatment of anorectal sepsis requires prompt surgical drainage, but it is important to identify any associated anal fistula for preventing recurrence. We evaluated whether microbiological analysis and/or endoanal ultrasonography could be used to predict anal fistula in patients with acute anorectal sepsis.
Five hundred fourteen consecutive patients with acute anorectal sepsis were studied. Clinical data, digital examination findings, endosonographic findings, and results of microbiological analysis were compared with definitive surgical findings of the presence or absence of anal fistula.
Anorectal abscess with anal fistula was found in 418 patients, and anorectal abscess without anal fistula was found in 96 patients. Microbiological examination showed that Escherichia coli, Bacteroides, Bacillus, and Klebsiella species were significantly more prevalent in patients with fistula (P<0.01), and coagulase-negative Staphylococci and Peptostreptococcus species were significantly more prevalent in patients without fistula (P<0.01). Results of endoanal ultrasonography were concordant with the definitive surgical diagnosis in 421 (94%) of 448 patients studied.
Acute anorectal sepsis due to colonization of "gut-derived" microorganisms rather than "skin-derived" organisms is more likely to be associated with anal fistula. When the microbiological analysis yields gut-derived bacteria, but no fistula has been found in the initial drainage operation, repeat examinations during a period of quiescence, including careful digital assessment and meticulous endosonography, are warranted to identify a potentially missed anal fistula.
肛管直肠脓毒症的治疗需要及时进行手术引流,但识别任何相关的肛瘘对于预防复发很重要。我们评估了微生物分析和/或肛门内超声检查是否可用于预测急性肛管直肠脓毒症患者的肛瘘。
对514例连续的急性肛管直肠脓毒症患者进行了研究。将临床数据、直肠指检结果、超声内镜检查结果和微生物分析结果与肛瘘存在与否的确定性手术结果进行比较。
418例患者发现有肛瘘的肛管直肠脓肿,96例患者发现无肛瘘的肛管直肠脓肿。微生物学检查显示,瘘管患者中大肠杆菌、拟杆菌、芽孢杆菌和克雷伯菌属的患病率显著更高(P<0.01),无瘘管患者中凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌和消化链球菌属的患病率显著更高(P<0.01)。在448例接受研究的患者中,421例(94%)的肛门内超声检查结果与确定性手术诊断一致。
由“肠道来源”微生物而非“皮肤来源”微生物定植引起的急性肛管直肠脓毒症更可能与肛瘘相关。当微生物分析产生肠道来源的细菌,但在初次引流手术中未发现瘘管时,在静止期进行重复检查,包括仔细的直肠指检和细致的超声内镜检查,对于识别可能遗漏的肛瘘是必要的。