Suppr超能文献

急性和慢性肛瘘患者术前评估中体格检查与肛门内超声检查准确性的比较。

Comparison of accuracy of physical examination and endoanal ultrasonography for preoperative assessment in patients with acute and chronic anal fistula.

作者信息

Toyonaga T, Tanaka Y, Song J F, Katori R, Sogawa N, Kanyama H, Hatakeyama T, Matsushima M, Suzuki S, Mibu R, Tanaka M

机构信息

Matsushima Hospital Colo-Proctology Center, 19-11 Tobehoncho, Nishi-ku, Yokohama, Japan.

出版信息

Tech Coloproctol. 2008 Sep;12(3):217-23. doi: 10.1007/s10151-008-0424-8. Epub 2008 Aug 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study was undertaken to evaluate the accuracy of endoanal ultrasonography for preoperative assessment of anal fistula, with special reference to the difference between acute and chronic fistula.

METHODS

The subjects comprised 401 patients treated for acute or chronic anorectal sepsis of cryptoglandular origin during the period January through December 2005. All patients underwent physical examination and endoanal ultrasonography. Agreement between the physical and endosonographic findings and the definitive surgical findings were evaluated with special reference to classification of the primary tract and horseshoe extension and localization of the internal opening. The difference in accuracy of endosonographic assessment between acute and chronic fistula was also evaluated.

RESULTS

The accuracy of endoanal ultrasonography was significantly higher than that of physical examination in detecting the primary tract (88.8% vs. 85.0%, p=0.0287) and horseshoe extension (85.7% vs. 58.7%, p<0.0001) and in localizing the internal opening (85.5% vs. 69.1%, p<0.0001). Furthermore, localization of the internal opening by endosonography was significantly more accurate in chronic fistula than in acute fistula (89.5 % vs. 76.8%, p<0.0001), although the accuracy in detecting the primary tract and horseshoe extension was not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoanal ultrasonography is reliable and useful for preoperative assessment of anal fistula, particularly for detecting horseshoe extension and localizing the internal opening. Endosonographic assessment provides clearer depiction of the internal opening during periods of quiescence than during the period of abscess formation. For patients with acute anorectal sepsis, initial surgical drainage and subsequent fistula surgery, rather than one-stage fistula surgery, may be advisable to avoid misidentification of the internal opening.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估经肛门超声检查在肛瘘术前评估中的准确性,特别关注急性肛瘘与慢性肛瘘之间的差异。

方法

研究对象为2005年1月至12月期间因腺源性急慢性肛肠感染而接受治疗的401例患者。所有患者均接受了体格检查和经肛门超声检查。特别参照原发瘘管的分类、马蹄形延伸以及内口的定位,评估了体格检查结果、超声检查结果与最终手术结果之间的一致性。还评估了急性肛瘘与慢性肛瘘在超声检查评估准确性方面的差异。

结果

在检测原发瘘管(88.8%对85.0%,p = 0.0287)、马蹄形延伸(85.7%对58.7%,p < 0.0001)以及定位内口(85.5%对69.1%,p < 0.0001)方面,经肛门超声检查的准确性显著高于体格检查。此外,尽管在检测原发瘘管和马蹄形延伸方面的准确性无显著差异,但经超声检查定位内口在慢性肛瘘中比在急性肛瘘中显著更准确(89.5%对76.8%,p < 0.0001)。

结论

经肛门超声检查在肛瘘术前评估中可靠且有用,尤其在检测马蹄形延伸和定位内口方面。超声检查评估在静止期比在脓肿形成期能更清晰地显示内口。对于急性肛肠感染患者,初始手术引流及随后的肛瘘手术,而非一期肛瘘手术,可能更可取,以避免对内口的误判。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验