Gumina S, Di Giorgio G, Bertino A, Della Rocca C, Sardella B, Postacchini F
Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology Surgery, University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Int Orthop. 2006 Oct;30(5):371-4. doi: 10.1007/s00264-006-0104-0. Epub 2006 Apr 7.
There is still considerable controversy as to whether or not the inflamed margins of a cuff tear should be excised during surgical suture. We have tried to discover whether anti-inflammatory drugs used before surgical treatment could resolve this issue. Thirty-eight patients were randomly either treated with an anti-inflammatory drug for 2 weeks or not. During the subsequent arthroscopic repair, a few fragments of supraspinatus edge were excised and examined microscopically. No significant differences emerged among samples belonging to the two groups. In all cases, we observed inflammatory infiltrate-lined tear edges. Fibrocytes and newly formed vessels were detected near the margin. Dystrophic calcifications were observed in both groups. Away from the edge, the tendon appeared hypocellular; containing areas with myxoid or fatty degeneration. Our study demonstrates that an anti-inflammatory drug is unable to resolve the inflammatory infiltrate. This failure is probably related to the poor blood supply to the cuff, which, in cases of rupture, is deprived of vessels coming from the humeral periosteum. Further studies are needed to understand how to eliminate the inflammatory process and clarify whether it might inhibit cuff healing and give rise to re-tearing of the sutured cuff.
关于在手术缝合时是否应该切除袖口撕裂处的炎症边缘,目前仍存在相当大的争议。我们试图探究手术治疗前使用抗炎药物是否能解决这个问题。38名患者被随机分为两组,一组接受抗炎药物治疗2周,另一组不接受治疗。在随后的关节镜修复过程中,切除了一些冈上肌边缘的碎片并进行显微镜检查。两组样本之间未出现显著差异。在所有病例中,我们观察到撕裂边缘有炎症浸润。在边缘附近检测到纤维细胞和新形成的血管。两组均观察到营养不良性钙化。远离边缘处,肌腱细胞较少;存在黏液样或脂肪变性区域。我们的研究表明,抗炎药物无法消除炎症浸润。这种失败可能与袖口血液供应不足有关,在破裂情况下,袖口失去了来自肱骨骨膜的血管供应。需要进一步研究以了解如何消除炎症过程,并阐明炎症是否可能抑制袖口愈合并导致缝合后的袖口再次撕裂。