• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

什么是有效干预?——运用健康促进理论

What is effective intervention?--using theories of health promotion.

作者信息

Davies Karen

机构信息

Worthing and Southlands NHS Trust, West Sussex.

出版信息

Br J Nurs. 2006;15(5):252-6.

PMID:16607253
Abstract

The increased prevalence of chronic disease offers nurses the challenge of providing educational interventions for people living and managing a condition such as diabetes mellitus. This article uses theoretical models and approaches from health promotion to offer perspectives to explain behaviour and determinants of health. The competing needs and perspectives are applied to see their relevance within diabetes nursing care, and in particular when looking at patient outcomes for a group intervention, raising the question: what is an effective intervention? Evaluating interventions needs clear identifiable values and aims, although this article highlights that success of any intervention will mean different things for the participant or health professional. There is a need for research into the subjective experiences of people with diabetes managing an intensive insulin regimen, and to value and include a wider definition of evidence-based outcomes.

摘要

慢性病患病率的上升给护士带来了挑战,即要为患有糖尿病等疾病并进行自我管理的人群提供教育干预措施。本文运用健康促进的理论模型和方法,提供解释行为和健康决定因素的观点。将相互竞争的需求和观点应用于糖尿病护理中,以审视它们在其中的相关性,特别是在考察群体干预的患者结果时,这就引发了一个问题:什么是有效的干预措施?评估干预措施需要明确可识别的价值观和目标,尽管本文强调任何干预措施的成功对参与者或健康专业人员而言可能意味着不同的事情。有必要对采用强化胰岛素治疗方案的糖尿病患者的主观体验进行研究,并重视和纳入对基于证据的结果更广泛的定义。

相似文献

1
What is effective intervention?--using theories of health promotion.什么是有效干预?——运用健康促进理论
Br J Nurs. 2006;15(5):252-6.
2
Positive effects of a psycho-educational group intervention for children with a chronic disease: first results.针对患有慢性疾病儿童的心理教育团体干预的积极效果:初步结果
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Jan;65(1):101-12. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.06.017. Epub 2006 Jul 25.
3
Diabetes Education and Self-Management for Ongoing and Newly Diagnosed (DESMOND): process modelling of pilot study.糖尿病持续及新诊断患者的教育与自我管理(DESMOND):试点研究的过程建模
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Dec;64(1-3):369-77. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.04.007. Epub 2006 Sep 29.
4
Self-care from the perspective of people living with diabetes.糖尿病患者视角下的自我护理。
Can J Nurs Res. 2006 Sep;38(3):124-45.
5
A developmental perspective on the challenges of diabetes education and care during the young adult period.关于青年期糖尿病教育与护理挑战的发展视角。
Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Jun;53(3):347-52. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2003.03.001.
6
Health promotion for women with human immunodeficiency virus or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.针对感染人类免疫缺陷病毒或获得性免疫缺陷综合征女性的健康促进
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2006 Nov;18(11):534-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2006.00169.x.
7
Guidance on delivering effective group education.关于提供有效团体教育的指南。
Br J Community Nurs. 2006 Nov;11(11):476-82. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2006.11.11.22276.
8
Patient empowerment in theory and practice: polysemy or cacophony?患者赋权的理论与实践:一词多义还是声音嘈杂?
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Apr;66(1):13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.09.008. Epub 2006 Nov 2.
9
Effects of a self-care program on the health-related quality of life of pacemaker patients: a nursing intervention study.自我护理计划对起搏器患者健康相关生活质量的影响:一项护理干预研究。
Can J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2007;17(1):15-26.
10
A health protection model for Hispanic adults with Type 2 diabetes.针对患有2型糖尿病的西班牙裔成年人的健康保护模式。
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Jul;16(7B):186-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01879.x.

引用本文的文献

1
More than A1C: Types of success among adults with type-2 diabetes participating in a technology-enabled nurse coaching intervention.不止糖化血红蛋白:参加基于技术的护士辅导干预的 2 型糖尿病成人的各种成功。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Jan;102(1):106-112. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.08.028. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
2
Ultra-rare disruptive and damaging mutations influence educational attainment in the general population.超罕见的破坏性突变会影响普通人群的受教育程度。
Nat Neurosci. 2016 Dec;19(12):1563-1565. doi: 10.1038/nn.4404. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
3
Self-care support in paediatric patients with type 1 diabetes: bridging the gap between patient education and health promotion? A review.
1型糖尿病儿科患者的自我护理支持:弥合患者教育与健康促进之间的差距?一项综述
Health Expect. 2015 Jun;18(3):303-11. doi: 10.1111/hex.12041. Epub 2013 Jan 14.