Medland Sarah E, Duffy David L, Wright Margaret J, Geffen Gina M, Martin Nicholas G
Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Australia.
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2006 Feb;9(1):46-53. doi: 10.1375/183242706776402885.
Simultaneous analysis of handedness data from 35 samples of twins (with a combined sample size of 21,127 twin pairs) found a small but significant additive genetic effect accounting for 25.47% of the variance (95% confidence interval [CI] 15.69-29.51%). No common environmental influences were detected (C = 0.00; 95% CI 0.00-7.67%), with the majority of the variance, 74.53%, explained by factors unique to the individual (95% CI 70.49-78.67%). No significant heterogeneity was observed within studies that used similar methods to assess handedness, or across studies that used different methods. At an individual level the majority of studies had insufficient power to reject a purely unique environmental model due to insufficient power to detect familial aggregation. This lack of power is seldom mentioned within studies, and has contributed to the misconception that twin studies of handedness are not informative.
对来自35个双胞胎样本(双胞胎对的合并样本量为21127对)的利手数据进行同步分析发现,存在一个虽小但显著的加性遗传效应,占方差的25.47%(95%置信区间[CI]为15.69 - 29.51%)。未检测到共同环境影响(C = 0.00;95% CI为0.00 - 7.67%),大部分方差(74.53%)由个体特有的因素解释(95% CI为70.49 - 78.67%)。在使用类似方法评估利手的研究中,以及在使用不同方法的研究之间,均未观察到显著的异质性。在个体层面,由于检测家族聚集性的能力不足,大多数研究没有足够的效力拒绝纯粹的独特环境模型。研究中很少提及这种能力不足的情况,这导致了一种误解,即关于利手的双胞胎研究没有信息量。