Lee J Y, Choi H J, Park I-N, Hong S-B, Oh Y-M, Lim C-M, Lee S D, Koh Y, Kim W S, Kim D S, Kim W D, Shim T S
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Dept of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine University of Ulsan, 388-1 Pungnap-2dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-736, South Korea.
Eur Respir J. 2006 Jul;28(1):24-30. doi: 10.1183/09031936.06.00016906. Epub 2006 Apr 12.
The clinical usefulness of ex vivo interferon-gamma assays may largely depend on the assay format and epidemiological status of tuberculosis (TB) in the region studied. From July 2004 to June 2005 a prospective comparison study was undertaken at a tertiary referral hospital in South Korea. The results of tuberculin skin tests (TST) and the commercially available QuantiFERON-TB Gold (QFT-G) and T SPOT-TB (SPOT) assays were compared in an intermediate TB-burden country. Of the 224 participants studied, results from all three tests (TST, QFT-G, and SPOT) were available in 218; 87 with active TB and 131 at a low risk for TB. Using 10 mm as a cut-off for TST, SPOT sensitivity (96.6%) was significantly higher than that seen for TST (66.7%) and QFT-G (70.1%). QFT-G showed superior specificity over TST (91.6 versus 78.6%). Although the specificity of QFT-G was higher than that of SPOT (91.6 versus 84.7%), the difference was not statistically significant. Whilst some differences were found in the performance of the two commercialised interferon-gamma assays, they seemed to be superior in their detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection compared with tuberculin skin tests. The most appropriate choice of interferon-gamma assay to use may depend on the clinical setting.
体外干扰素-γ检测的临床实用性可能在很大程度上取决于检测方法以及所研究地区结核病(TB)的流行状况。2004年7月至2005年6月,在韩国一家三级转诊医院进行了一项前瞻性比较研究。在一个结核病负担中等的国家,对结核菌素皮肤试验(TST)以及市售的结核感染T细胞检测(QFT-G)和T-SPOT.TB(SPOT)检测的结果进行了比较。在所研究的224名参与者中,218名获得了所有三项检测(TST、QFT-G和SPOT)的结果;其中87例患有活动性结核病,131例结核病患病风险较低。以10毫米作为TST的临界值,SPOT的敏感性(96.6%)显著高于TST(66.7%)和QFT-G(70.1%)。QFT-G的特异性优于TST(分别为91.6%和78.6%)。尽管QFT-G的特异性高于SPOT(分别为91.6%和84.7%),但差异无统计学意义。虽然在两种商业化的干扰素-γ检测的性能方面发现了一些差异,但与结核菌素皮肤试验相比,它们在检测结核分枝杆菌感染方面似乎更具优势。使用干扰素-γ检测的最合适选择可能取决于临床情况。