Barbosa T M, Fernandes R, Keskinen K L, Colaço P, Cardoso C, Silva J, Vilas-Boas J P
Department of Sports Sciences, Polytechnic Institute of Bragança, Bragança, Portugal.
Int J Sports Med. 2006 Nov;27(11):894-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-923776. Epub 2006 Apr 11.
The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the total energy expenditure of the four competitive swimming strokes. Twenty-six swimmers of international level were submitted to an incremental set of 200-m swims (5 swimmers at Breaststroke, 5 swimmers at Backstroke, 4 swimmers at Butterfly and 12 swimmers at Front Crawl). The starting velocity was approximately 0.3 m x s (-1) less than a swimmer's best performance and thereafter increased by 0.05 m x s (-1) after each swim until exhaustion. Cardio-pulmonary and gas exchange parameters were measured breath-by-breath (BxB) for each swim to analyze oxygen consumption (VO2) and other energetic parameters by portable metabolic cart (K4b(2), Cosmed, Rome, Italy). A respiratory snorkel and valve system with low hydrodynamic resistance was used to measure pulmonary ventilation and to collect breathing air samples. Blood samples from the ear lobe were collected before and after each swim to analyze blood lactate concentration (YSI 1500 L, Yellow Springs, Ohio, USA). Total energy expenditure (E(tot)), was calculated for each 200-m stage. E (tot) differed significantly between the strokes at all selected velocities. At the velocity of 1.0 m x s (-1) and of 1.2 m x s (-1) the E(tot) was significantly higher in Breaststroke than in Backstroke, in Breaststroke than in Freestyle and in Butterfly than in Freestyle. At the velocity of 1.4 m x s (-1), the E(tot) was significantly higher in Breaststroke than in Backstroke, in Backstroke than in Freestyle, in Breaststroke than in Freestyle and in Butterfly than in Freestyle. At the velocity of 1.6 m x s (-1), the E(tot) was significantly higher in Breaststroke and in Butterfly than in Freestyle. As a conclusion, E(tot) of well-trained competitive swimmers was measured over a large range of velocities utilising a new BxB technique. Freestyle was shown to be the most economic among the competitive swimming strokes, followed by the Backstroke, the Butterfly and the Breaststroke.
本研究的目的是测量和比较四种竞技游泳姿势的总能量消耗。26名国际水平的游泳运动员进行了一组递增的200米游泳测试(5名蛙泳运动员、5名仰泳运动员、4名蝶泳运动员和12名自由泳运动员)。起始速度比运动员的最佳成绩慢约0.3米/秒,此后每次游泳后速度增加0.05米/秒,直至精疲力竭。每次游泳时通过逐次呼吸(BxB)测量心肺和气体交换参数,以使用便携式代谢车(K4b(2),Cosmed,罗马,意大利)分析耗氧量(VO2)和其他能量参数。使用具有低流体动力阻力的呼吸通气管和阀门系统测量肺通气并收集呼吸空气样本。在每次游泳前后采集耳垂血样,以分析血乳酸浓度(YSI 1500 L,美国俄亥俄州黄泉市)。计算每个200米阶段的总能量消耗(E(tot))。在所有选定速度下,不同泳姿的E(tot)存在显著差异。在1.0米/秒和1.2米/秒的速度下,蛙泳的E(tot)显著高于仰泳、高于自由泳,蝶泳的E(tot)高于自由泳。在1.4米/秒的速度下,蛙泳的E(tot)显著高于仰泳、高于自由泳,蛙泳的E(tot)高于自由泳,蝶泳的E(tot)高于自由泳。在1.6米/秒的速度下,蛙泳和蝶泳的E(tot)显著高于自由泳。总之,利用一种新的逐次呼吸技术,在较大速度范围内测量了训练有素的竞技游泳运动员的E(tot)。结果表明,在竞技游泳姿势中,自由泳最经济,其次是仰泳、蝶泳和蛙泳。