Nickel J Curtis
Empire 4, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Am J Manag Care. 2006 Apr;12(5 Suppl):S141-8.
The current treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) include pharmacotherapy with alpha1-selective adrenergic receptor (a1-AR) antagonists, 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors (5-aRIs), and a range of invasive and minimally invasive interventions, each of which is effective in the amelioration of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and the prevention of symptom progression and BPH-related complications. Pharmacotherapy is considered the mainstay of treatment for LUTS caused by BPH. The available a1-AR antagonists have comparable efficacy for the relief of LUTS and to enhance patients' quality of life. The use of nonsubtype-selective drugs in this class may precipitate vasodilatory adverse events such as dizziness, somnolence, and orthostatic hypotension. Based on current studies, a1-AR antagonists are more cost effective (particularly the subtype-selective a1-AR antagonist, tamsulosin) than the 5-aRIs (eg, finasteride) and comparable in cost to transurethral resection of the prostate and minimally invasive therapies. There are few cost-effectiveness studies comparing the various pharmacologic interventions for BPH. Only 1 cost-analysis model has addressed the impact of adverse events on the cost effectiveness of pharmacotherapy for BPH. The publication of additional analyses would contribute to the appropriate selection of therapy in patients with BPH.
目前治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)的方法包括使用α1选择性肾上腺素能受体(α1-AR)拮抗剂、5-α还原酶抑制剂(5-aRIs)进行药物治疗,以及一系列侵入性和微创干预措施,每种方法在改善下尿路症状(LUTS)、预防症状进展和BPH相关并发症方面均有效。药物治疗被认为是BPH所致LUTS的主要治疗方法。现有的α1-AR拮抗剂在缓解LUTS和提高患者生活质量方面具有相当的疗效。此类非亚型选择性药物的使用可能会引发血管舒张性不良事件,如头晕、嗜睡和体位性低血压。根据目前的研究,α1-AR拮抗剂(尤其是亚型选择性α1-AR拮抗剂坦索罗辛)比5-aRIs(如非那雄胺)更具成本效益,且在成本上与经尿道前列腺切除术和微创治疗相当。很少有成本效益研究比较BPH的各种药物干预措施。只有1个成本分析模型探讨了不良事件对BPH药物治疗成本效益的影响。更多分析的发表将有助于BPH患者选择合适的治疗方法。