Alhashemi J A, Daghistani M F
Department of Anesthesia, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Br J Anaesth. 2006 Jun;96(6):790-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael084. Epub 2006 Apr 13.
Enteral acetaminophen, when used alone, is not very effective for postoperative analgesia because of delayed absorption and sub-therapeutic plasma concentrations. In contrast, i.v. acetaminophen is devoid of these shortcomings and could potentially provide adequate postoperative analgesia as a single agent. This randomized double-blind study compared the analgesic effects of i.v. acetaminophen and i.m. meperidine in paediatric patients undergoing tonsillectomy.
Eighty children undergoing tonsillectomy were randomized to receive either acetaminophen 15 mg kg(-1) i.v. (acetaminophen group) or meperidine 1 mg kg(-1) i.m. (meperidine group), intraoperatively. Anaesthesia was induced with either sevoflurane inhalation or propofol, and was maintained with sevoflurane. After operation, the objective pain scale (OPS), Ramsay sedation score and Aldrete score were recorded every 5 min, and nurses' satisfaction was determined on a 7-point scale (1-7).
On admission to the recovery room, OPS scores were 3.1 (sem 0.3) for the acetaminophen group and 2.1 (sem 0.3) for the meperidine group (P=0.147); however, Ramsay sedation scores were 3 (sem 0.2) and 4 (sem 0.3) for the acetaminophen and meperidine groups, respectively (P<0.05). Patients in the meperidine group continued to be more sedated 5 min after arrival in recovery (P<0.05). Acetaminophen group patients achieved an Aldrete score of 10 min sooner than those in the meperidine group [median (IQR) time: 15 (0-20) min vs 25 (15-30) min, respectively, P=0.005]. Adjusted nurse satisfaction scores were similar in both groups [6.1 (sem 0.2) vs 5.7 (sem 0.2) min, P=0.311].
Compared with i.m. meperidine, i.v. acetaminophen provided adequate analgesia, less sedation and earlier readiness for recovery room discharge among paediatric patients undergoing tonsillectomy.
单独使用肠内对乙酰氨基酚时,由于吸收延迟和血浆浓度低于治疗水平,对术后镇痛效果不佳。相比之下,静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚没有这些缺点,有可能作为单一药物提供足够的术后镇痛。这项随机双盲研究比较了静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚和肌肉注射哌替啶在接受扁桃体切除术的儿科患者中的镇痛效果。
80名接受扁桃体切除术的儿童在术中被随机分为静脉注射15mg/kg对乙酰氨基酚组(对乙酰氨基酚组)或肌肉注射1mg/kg哌替啶组(哌替啶组)。麻醉诱导采用七氟醚吸入或丙泊酚,维持采用七氟醚。术后,每5分钟记录一次客观疼痛量表(OPS)、 Ramsay镇静评分和Aldrete评分,并采用7分制(1-7)确定护士满意度。
进入恢复室时,对乙酰氨基酚组的OPS评分为3.1(标准误0.3),哌替啶组为2.1(标准误0.3)(P=0.147);然而,对乙酰氨基酚组和哌替啶组的Ramsay镇静评分分别为3(标准误0.2)和4(标准误0.3)(P<0.05)。哌替啶组患者在进入恢复室5分钟后仍处于更镇静状态(P<0.05)。对乙酰氨基酚组患者达到Aldrete评分的时间比哌替啶组早10分钟[中位数(四分位间距)时间:分别为15(0-20)分钟和25(15-30)分钟,P=0.005]。两组调整后的护士满意度评分相似[6.1(标准误0.2)对5.7(标准误0.2),P=0.311]。
与肌肉注射哌替啶相比,静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚在接受扁桃体切除术的儿科患者中提供了足够的镇痛效果,镇静作用较小,且更早具备从恢复室出院的条件。