Suppr超能文献

里尔淡漠评定量表(LARS):一种用于检测和量化淡漠的新工具——在帕金森病中的验证

The Lille apathy rating scale (LARS), a new instrument for detecting and quantifying apathy: validation in Parkinson's disease.

作者信息

Sockeel P, Dujardin K, Devos D, Denève C, Destée A, Defebvre L

机构信息

Psychology Department, Charles De Gaulle University, and Neurology and Movement Disorders Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Lille University Hospital, France.

出版信息

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006 May;77(5):579-84. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2005.075929.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Apathy is usually defined as reduced interest and participation in various activities. It is a frequent consequence of neurological and psychiatric disorders. Although various scoring methods have been proposed, there is a lack of validated, standardised instruments for detecting apathy and assessing its severity.

OBJECTIVE

To develop an apathy rating scale using a structured standardised interview capable of distinguishing between the condition's various features.

METHODS

The Lille Apathy Rating Scale (LARS) is based on a structured interview. It includes 33 items, divided into nine domains. Responses are scored on a dichotomous scale. The participants used to validate the scale consisted of 159 patients with probable Parkinson's disease and 58 healthy control subjects. The Marin Apathy Scale, the Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale, and the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale were also administered.

RESULTS

Principal component analysis showed that the LARS probed a single construct which forms the root of an oblique factor structure reflecting four dimensions: intellectual curiosity, self awareness, emotion, and action initiation. The main psychometric properties of the LARS (internal consistency, inter-rater and test-retest reliability) were satisfactory. Concurrent validity was evaluated by reference to the Marin scale and to judgements provided by expert clinicians.

CONCLUSIONS

Standard validity indices showed that the LARS is sensitive and capable of distinguishing between apathy and depression. As a screening tool, the scale is able to support dichotomous judgements accurately and, when greater measurement sensitivity is required, also determine the severity of apathy within a four category classification.

摘要

背景

冷漠通常被定义为对各种活动的兴趣和参与度降低。它是神经和精神疾病的常见后果。尽管已经提出了各种评分方法,但缺乏经过验证的、标准化的工具来检测冷漠并评估其严重程度。

目的

使用能够区分该病症各种特征的结构化标准化访谈来制定冷漠评定量表。

方法

里尔冷漠评定量表(LARS)基于结构化访谈。它包括33个项目,分为九个领域。回答按二分法评分。用于验证该量表的参与者包括159名可能患有帕金森病的患者和58名健康对照者。还使用了马林冷漠量表、蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表和马蒂斯痴呆评定量表。

结果

主成分分析表明,LARS探究了一个单一结构,该结构构成了反映四个维度的斜交因子结构的根源:求知欲、自我意识、情感和行动启动。LARS的主要心理测量特性(内部一致性、评分者间信度和重测信度)令人满意。通过参考马林量表和专家临床医生的判断来评估同时效度。

结论

标准效度指标表明,LARS敏感且能够区分冷漠和抑郁。作为一种筛查工具,该量表能够准确支持二分法判断,并且在需要更高测量灵敏度时,还能在四类分类中确定冷漠的严重程度。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

8
Improvement of apathy in early Parkinson's disease.早期帕金森病中淡漠症状的改善
NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2025 Apr 24;11(1):89. doi: 10.1038/s41531-025-00937-w.

本文引用的文献

3
Apathy in Parkinson's disease.帕金森病中的淡漠
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002 Dec;73(6):636-42. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.73.6.636.
4
Syndromic validity of apathy in Alzheimer's disease.阿尔茨海默病中淡漠症状的综合征效度
Am J Psychiatry. 2001 Jun;158(6):872-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.6.872.
5
Group differences in the relationship between apathy and depression.冷漠与抑郁关系中的组间差异。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1994 Apr;182(4):235-9. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199404000-00008.
6
7
Apathy: Concept, Syndrome, Neural Mechanisms, and Treatment.
Semin Clin Neuropsychiatry. 1996 Oct;1(4):304-314. doi: 10.1053/SCNP00100304.
9
Apathy is not depression.冷漠并非抑郁。
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1998 Summer;10(3):314-9. doi: 10.1176/jnp.10.3.314.
10
Prevalence of apathy following head injury.头部受伤后冷漠症的患病率。
Brain Inj. 1998 Jan;12(1):87-92. doi: 10.1080/026990598122908.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验