患病个体与患病群体：20年后
Sick individuals and sick populations: 20 years later.
作者信息
Doyle Y G, Furey A, Flowers J
机构信息
South East London Strategic Health Authority and European Centre on Health of Societies in Transition, London School of Hygiene and Tropical medicine, Waterloo, London, UK.
出版信息
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 May;60(5):396-8. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.042770.
Abstract
Twenty years after Geoffrey Rose published his classic paper, the central messages remain highly relevant to modern public health policy and practice. The individual and population approaches are fundamentally different but both are needed. Recent examples of powerful population approaches prove Rose's point that norms can change benefiting the most deprived. Individual approaches have also succeeded but their protection of the most deprived communities is limited. Consumerism in health and over-reliance on individual approaches risk widening health inequalities.
摘要
杰弗里·罗斯发表其经典论文二十年后，其核心观点对于现代公共卫生政策与实践仍然高度相关。个体方法和群体方法有着根本区别，但两者都不可或缺。近期强有力的群体方法实例证明了罗斯的观点，即规范能够改变，从而惠及最贫困人群。个体方法也取得了成功，但其对最贫困社区的保护作用有限。健康领域的消费主义以及对个体方法的过度依赖，可能会加剧健康不平等。
相似文献
1
Sick individuals and sick populations: 20 years later.患病个体与患病群体：20年后
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 May;60(5):396-8. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.042770.
2
The idea of uniform change: is it time to revisit a central tenet of Rose's "Strategy of Preventive Medicine"?统一变化的理念：是时候重新审视罗斯“预防医学策略”的核心原则了吗？
Am J Clin Nutr. 2016 Dec;104(6):1497-1507. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.127357. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
3
Rose's population strategy of prevention need not increase social inequalities in health.罗斯的预防人群策略不一定会增加健康方面的社会不平等。
Int J Epidemiol. 2010 Apr;39(2):372-7. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp315. Epub 2009 Nov 3.
4
Sick people and sick populations--legacy of Geoffrey Rose.病人与患病群体——杰弗里·罗斯的遗产
Przegl Epidemiol. 2014;68(3):475-9, 577-81.
5
Beyond Rose's strategies: a typology of scenarios of policy impact on population health and health inequalities.超越罗丝策略：影响人口健康和健康不平等的政策影响情景的分类学。
Int J Health Serv. 2011;41(1):1-9. doi: 10.2190/HS.41.1.a.
6
A critique of Geoffrey Rose's 'population strategy' for preventive medicine.对杰弗里·罗斯预防医学“人群策略”的批判。
J R Soc Med. 1995 Nov;88(11):607-10. doi: 10.1177/014107689508801102.
7
In defense of a population-level approach to prevention: why public health matters today.捍卫以人群为基础的预防方法：为什么公共卫生今天至关重要。
Can J Public Health. 2019 Jun;110(3):279-284. doi: 10.17269/s41997-019-00198-0. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
8
Prevention and Control Strategies for Non-Communicable Disease: Goldberger, Pellagra and Rose Revisited.非传染性疾病的防控策略：重温戈德伯格、糙皮病与罗斯的研究
Epidemiologia (Basel). 2022 Apr 6;3(2):191-198. doi: 10.3390/epidemiologia3020015.
9
A new typology of policies to tackle health inequalities and scenarios of impact based on Rose's population approach.一种新的政策分类方法，旨在解决健康不平等问题，并根据罗斯的人口方法评估影响情景。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013 Mar;67(3):286-91. doi: 10.1136/jech-2011-200363. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
10
["Shifting the Curve": New Developments and Challenges in the Field of Public Mental Health].《“改变曲线”：公共心理健康领域的新发展与挑战》
Psychiatr Prax. 2023 Apr;50(3):160-164. doi: 10.1055/a-1823-5191. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
引用本文的文献
1
The effects of an app to prevent negative outcomes of cyberbullying: A cluster randomized controlled trial.一款预防网络欺凌负面后果的应用程序的效果：一项整群随机对照试验。
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Apr 22;4(4):e0000819. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000819. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
Gesundheitswesen. 2025 Jan;87(1):17-20. doi: 10.1055/a-2419-8655. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
3
The role of neighborhood inequalities on diabetes prevention care: a mini-review.社区不平等在糖尿病预防护理中的作用：一篇综述
Front Clin Diabetes Healthc. 2023 Nov 15;4:1292006. doi: 10.3389/fcdhc.2023.1292006. eCollection 2023.
4
Weight gain in pregnancy and infant birthweight after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic: an interrupted time series analysis.妊娠期体重增加和 COVID-19 大流行开始后婴儿出生体重：一项中断时间序列分析。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2023 Feb;117(2):364-372. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2022.09.001.
5
A rapid realist review of universal interventions to promote inclusivity and acceptance of diverse sexual and gender identities in schools.快速现实主义综述：促进学校对多样化性和性别认同的包容性和接受度的普遍干预措施。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Apr;7(4):556-567. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01521-z. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
6
Medical education and population health-A framework in the design of a new undergraduate program.医学教育与人群健康——新本科课程设计的框架。
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 7;10:1068092. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1068092. eCollection 2022.
7
An Overview of Strategies to Improve Vaccination Compliance before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情大流行前后提高疫苗接种依从性的策略概述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 3;19(17):11044. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191711044.
8
Understanding income-related differences in distribution of child growth, behaviour and development using a cross-sectional sample of a clinical cohort study.利用临床队列研究的横断面样本理解儿童生长、行为和发育的收入相关差异。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 15;12(2):e056991. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056991.
9
The impact of clinical and population strategies on coronary heart disease mortality: an assessment of Rose's big idea.临床和人群策略对冠心病死亡率的影响：对罗丝大创意的评估。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jan 6;22(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12421-0.
10
Low and High Ambient Temperatures during Pregnancy and Birth Weight among 624,940 Singleton Term Births in Israel (2010-2014): An Investigation of Potential Windows of Susceptibility.以色列 624940 例单胎足月产中妊娠和出生体重与低/高环境温度（2010-2014 年）：潜在易感性窗口的研究。
Environ Health Perspect. 2021 Oct;129(10):107001. doi: 10.1289/EHP8117. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
本文引用的文献
1
C-reactive protein in 2005. Interview by Peter C. Block.2005年的C反应蛋白。彼得·C·布洛克访谈。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Jul 5;46(1):CS2-5.
2
Context and healthcare access: looking beyond the individual.背景与医疗服务可及性：超越个体层面的考量
Med Care. 2005 Jun;43(6):531-40. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000163642.88413.58.
3
A national strategy for smoking cessation treatment in England.英国戒烟治疗国家战略。
Addiction. 2005 Apr;100 Suppl 2:1-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01022.x.
4
Feeling bad about immunising our children.对给我们的孩子接种疫苗感到愧疚。
Vaccine. 2005 Feb 10;23(12):1428-33. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.10.004.
5
Health by association? Social capital, social theory, and the political economy of public health.因关联而健康？社会资本、社会理论与公共卫生的政治经济学
Int J Epidemiol. 2004 Aug;33(4):650-67. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyh013. Epub 2004 Jul 28.
6
Framingham risk score and prediction of lifetime risk for coronary heart disease.弗雷明汉风险评分与冠心病终生风险预测
Am J Cardiol. 2004 Jul 1;94(1):20-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.03.023.
7
Measuring and monitoring success in compressing morbidity.衡量和监测在压缩发病率方面的成效。
Ann Intern Med. 2003 Sep 2;139(5 Pt 2):455-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-5_part_2-200309021-00015.
8
Social inclusion and the public health: the case for partnerships.社会包容与公共卫生：伙伴关系的实例
N S W Public Health Bull. 2002 Jun;13(6):133-6. doi: 10.1071/nb02056.
9
Social capital, disorganized communities, and the third way: understanding the retreat from structural inequalities in epidemiology and public health.社会资本、无序社区与第三条道路：理解流行病学和公共卫生领域对结构性不平等的摒弃
Int J Health Serv. 2001;31(2):213-37. doi: 10.2190/NVW3-4HH0-74PX-AC38.
10
Chronic disability trends in elderly United States populations: 1982-1994.美国老年人群的慢性残疾趋势：1982 - 1994年
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Mar 18;94(6):2593-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.6.2593.
Zotero 插件