• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

弗雷明汉风险评分与冠心病终生风险预测

Framingham risk score and prediction of lifetime risk for coronary heart disease.

作者信息

Lloyd-Jones Donald M, Wilson Peter W F, Larson Martin G, Beiser Alexa, Leip Eric P, D'Agostino Ralph B, Levy Daniel

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine and Division of Cardiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois,

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2004 Jul 1;94(1):20-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.03.023.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.03.023
PMID:15219502
Abstract

We investigated whether the Framingham risk score, which was designed to estimate the 10-year risk of coronary heart disease (CHD), differentiates lifetime risk for CHD. All subjects in the Framingham Heart Study examined from 1971 to 1996 who were free of CHD were included. Subjects were stratified into age- and gender-specific tertiles of Framingham risk score, and lifetime risk for CHD was estimated. We followed 2,716 men and 3,500 women; 939 developed CHD and 1,363 died free of CHD. At age 40 years, in risk score tertiles 1, 2, and 3, respectively, the lifetime risks for CHD were 38.4%, 41.7%, and 50.7% for men and 12.2%, 25.4%, and 33.2% for women. At age 80 years, risks were 16.4%, 17.4%, and 38.8% for men and 12.8%, 22.4%, and 27.4% for women. The Framingham risk score stratified lifetime risk well for women at all ages. It performed less well in younger men but improved at older ages as remaining life expectancy approached 10 years. Lifetime risks contrasted sharply with shorter term risks: at age 40 years, the 10-year risks of CHD in tertiles 1, 2, and 3, respectively, were 0%, 2.2%, and 11.6% for men and 0%, 0.7%, and 2.3% for women. The Framingham 10-year CHD risk prediction model discriminated short-term risk well for men and women. However, it may not identify subjects with low short-term but high lifetime risk for CHD, likely due to changes in risk factor status over time. Further work is needed to generate multivariate risk models that can reliably predict lifetime risk for CHD.

摘要

我们研究了旨在评估冠心病(CHD)10年风险的弗雷明汉风险评分是否能区分冠心病的终生风险。纳入了弗雷明汉心脏研究中1971年至1996年间接受检查且无冠心病的所有受试者。受试者按弗雷明汉风险评分的年龄和性别特异性三分位数分层,并估算冠心病的终生风险。我们随访了2716名男性和3500名女性;939人患冠心病,1363人无冠心病死亡。在40岁时,风险评分三分位数1、2和3中,男性冠心病终生风险分别为38.4%、41.7%和50.7%,女性分别为12.2%、25.4%和33.2%。在80岁时,男性风险分别为16.4%、17.4%和38.8%,女性分别为12.8%、22.4%和27.4%。弗雷明汉风险评分在各年龄段对女性终生风险的分层效果良好。在年轻男性中表现较差,但随着预期剩余寿命接近10年,在老年男性中表现有所改善。终生风险与短期风险形成鲜明对比:在40岁时,风险评分三分位数1、2和3中,男性冠心病10年风险分别为0%、2.2%和11.6%,女性分别为0%、0.7%和2.3%。弗雷明汉10年冠心病风险预测模型对男性和女性短期风险的区分效果良好。然而,它可能无法识别短期风险低但冠心病终生风险高的受试者,这可能是由于风险因素状态随时间变化所致。需要进一步开展工作以生成能够可靠预测冠心病终生风险的多变量风险模型。

相似文献

1
Framingham risk score and prediction of lifetime risk for coronary heart disease.弗雷明汉风险评分与冠心病终生风险预测
Am J Cardiol. 2004 Jul 1;94(1):20-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.03.023.
2
Lifetime risk of coronary heart disease by cholesterol levels at selected ages.特定年龄时不同胆固醇水平下冠心病的终生风险。
Arch Intern Med. 2003 Sep 8;163(16):1966-72. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.16.1966.
3
Lifetime risk of developing coronary heart disease.患冠心病的终生风险。
Lancet. 1999 Jan 9;353(9147):89-92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)10279-9.
4
Usefulness of exercise testing in the prediction of coronary disease risk among asymptomatic persons as a function of the Framingham risk score.运动试验在根据弗雷明汉风险评分预测无症状人群冠心病风险中的作用。
Circulation. 2004 Oct 5;110(14):1920-5. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000143226.40607.71. Epub 2004 Sep 27.
5
Prediction of coronary heart disease risk in a general, pre-diabetic, and diabetic population during 10 years of follow-up: accuracy of the Framingham, SCORE, and UKPDS risk functions: The Hoorn Study.10 年随访期间一般、糖尿病前期和糖尿病患者人群的冠心病风险预测:弗雷明汉、SCORE 和 UKPDS 风险函数的准确性:霍恩研究。
Diabetes Care. 2009 Nov;32(11):2094-8. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0745.
6
Predictive value for the Chinese population of the Framingham CHD risk assessment tool compared with the Chinese Multi-Provincial Cohort Study.与中国多省队列研究相比,弗雷明汉冠心病风险评估工具对中国人群的预测价值。
JAMA. 2004 Jun 2;291(21):2591-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.21.2591.
7
Validation of the Framingham coronary heart disease prediction scores: results of a multiple ethnic groups investigation.弗雷明汉姆冠心病预测评分的验证:多民族调查结果
JAMA. 2001 Jul 11;286(2):180-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.2.180.
8
Evaluation of the Framingham risk score in the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer-Norfolk cohort: does adding glycated hemoglobin improve the prediction of coronary heart disease events?在欧洲癌症与营养前瞻性调查-诺福克队列中对弗雷明汉风险评分的评估:添加糖化血红蛋白是否能改善冠心病事件的预测?
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Jun 9;168(11):1209-16. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.11.1209.
9
How generalizable are coronary risk prediction models? Comparison of Framingham and two national cohorts.冠状动脉风险预测模型的可推广性如何?弗雷明汉心脏研究与两个国家队列的比较。
Am Heart J. 1999 May;137(5):837-45. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(99)70407-2.
10
Does job strain increase the risk for coronary heart disease or death in men and women? The Framingham Offspring Study.工作压力会增加男性和女性患冠心病或死亡的风险吗?弗雷明汉后代研究。
Am J Epidemiol. 2004 May 15;159(10):950-8. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh127.

引用本文的文献

1
An AI-Enabled, Patient-Centred Digital Platform for Integrated Chronic Heart Failure Management: Architecture, Validation and Clinical Insights.一个用于综合慢性心力衰竭管理的人工智能驱动、以患者为中心的数字平台:架构、验证与临床见解。
Healthc Technol Lett. 2025 Sep 6;12(1):e70015. doi: 10.1049/htl2.70015. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
The quality of patient decision aids for lung cancer screening: Results from an environmental scan.肺癌筛查患者决策辅助工具的质量:一项环境扫描的结果
Cancer. 2025 Sep 1;131(17):e70008. doi: 10.1002/cncr.70008.
3
Prognostic Value of High-Sensitivity Troponin in Predicting Long-Term Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review.
高敏肌钙蛋白在预测2型糖尿病患者长期心血管结局中的预后价值:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2025 May 11;17(5):e83925. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83925. eCollection 2025 May.
4
Cardiovascular Risk Assessment via Sleep Patterns and ECG-Based Biological Age Estimation.通过睡眠模式和基于心电图的生物年龄估计进行心血管风险评估。
J Clin Med. 2025 May 11;14(10):3339. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103339.
5
Association Between Breastfeeding and Long-Term Risk of Cardiovascular Disease.母乳喂养与心血管疾病长期风险之间的关联
Obstet Gynecol. 2025 May 22;146(1):11-18. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005943.
6
Predicting the risks of stroke, cardiovascular disease, and peripheral vascular disease among people with type 2 diabetes with artificial intelligence models: A systematic review and meta-analysis.使用人工智能模型预测2型糖尿病患者中风、心血管疾病和外周血管疾病的风险:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
Narra J. 2025 Apr;5(1):e2116. doi: 10.52225/narra.v5i1.2116. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
7
Development of Simple Risk Scores for Prediction of Brain β-Amyloid and Tau Status in Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Machine Learning Approach.用于预测轻度认知障碍老年人脑β淀粉样蛋白和tau蛋白状态的简单风险评分的开发:一种机器学习方法。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2025 Jun 10;80(7). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaf085.
8
Cerebrovascular health impacts processing speed through anterior white matter alterations: a UK biobank study.脑血管健康通过前脑白质改变影响处理速度:一项英国生物银行研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 21;15(1):9860. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93399-2.
9
Comparative Analysis of Waist-Height Ratio and Heart Rate Recovery for Predicting Coronary Heart Disease Risk Among Working Malaysian Women.腰高比与心率恢复对马来西亚职业女性冠心病风险预测的比较分析
Int J Womens Health. 2025 Mar 15;17:761-769. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S497927. eCollection 2025.
10
Individual heterogeneity, educational attainment and cardiovascular mortality: a pooled analysis of Norwegian health surveys.个体异质性、教育程度与心血管疾病死亡率:挪威健康调查的汇总分析
BMJ Public Health. 2024 Sep 23;2(2):e000104. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000104. eCollection 2024 Dec.