Alexander G Caleb, Larkin G Luke, Wynia Matthew K
MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, and Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, MC 2007, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Nov;13(11):1238-41. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.12.022. Epub 2006 Apr 13.
Potential bioterrorism challenges policy makers to balance competing public health priorities. Earlier surveys showed low physician bioterrorism preparedness but did not assess physicians' general public health preparedness, compare the preparedness of emergency and primary care physicians, or assess temporal trends.
This was a national, cross-sectional, random-sample survey conducted in 2003.
Overall, 744 of 1,200 eligible physicians responded (response rate, 62%). Of these, 58% of emergency physician respondents and 48% of primary care physician respondents reported having learned a lot about responding to bioterror since September 11, 2001 (p < 0.01). However, only 43% of emergency physicians and 21% of primary care physicians agreed they are generally "well prepared to play a role in responding to a bioterror attack" (p < 0.001). Beliefs about balancing public health priorities were similar among emergency and primary care respondents. Seventy-eight percent of respondents believed that local health care systems need to be prepared for bioterrorism, and 92% believed that local health care systems need to be prepared for natural epidemics. By contrast, only 23% and 46% of respondents reported that their local health care systems are well prepared for bioterrorism and natural epidemics, respectively. Meanwhile, 77% agreed that "influenza is a greater threat to public health than bioterrorism," and 21% reported that bioterrorism preparedness efforts are diverting resources from more important public health problems.
In 2003, most emergency and primary care physicians reported that they and their local health care systems were not yet well prepared to respond to a bioterror attack, and many believed that more resources should go toward preparing for natural epidemics. These findings highlight the importance of expanding bioterrorism preparedness efforts to improve the public health system more broadly.
潜在的生物恐怖主义向政策制定者提出挑战,要求他们在相互竞争的公共卫生重点事项之间取得平衡。早期的调查显示医生对生物恐怖主义的防范准备不足,但未评估医生的总体公共卫生防范准备情况,未比较急诊医生和初级保健医生的防范准备情况,也未评估时间趋势。
这是2003年进行的一项全国性横断面随机抽样调查。
总体而言,1200名符合条件的医生中有744人做出回应(回应率为62%)。其中,58%的急诊医生受访者和48%的初级保健医生受访者表示,自2001年9月11日以来,他们对应对生物恐怖主义有了很多了解(p<0.01)。然而,只有43%的急诊医生和21%的初级保健医生同意他们总体上“做好了应对生物恐怖袭击的充分准备”(p<0.001)。急诊和初级保健受访者在平衡公共卫生重点事项的看法上相似。78%的受访者认为地方医疗保健系统需要为生物恐怖主义做好准备,92%的受访者认为地方医疗保健系统需要为自然流行病做好准备。相比之下,分别只有23%和46%的受访者表示他们所在的地方医疗保健系统为生物恐怖主义和自然流行病做好了充分准备。同时,77%的人同意“流感对公众健康的威胁大于生物恐怖主义”,21%的人表示生物恐怖主义防范准备工作正在从更重要的公共卫生问题上转移资源。
2003年,大多数急诊和初级保健医生表示,他们自己以及所在的地方医疗保健系统尚未做好应对生物恐怖袭击的充分准备,许多人认为应该将更多资源用于应对自然流行病的准备工作。这些发现凸显了扩大生物恐怖主义防范准备工作以更广泛地改善公共卫生系统的重要性。