Christian Michael D, Devereaux Asha V, Dichter Jeffrey R, Geiling James A, Rubinson Lewis
FRCPC, Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Ave, Suite 18-206, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 1X5.
Chest. 2008 May;133(5 Suppl):8S-17S. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-2707.
In the twentieth century, rarely have mass casualty events yielded hundreds or thousands of critically ill patients requiring definitive critical care. However, future catastrophic natural disasters, epidemics or pandemics, nuclear device detonations, or large chemical exposures may change usual disaster epidemiology and require a large critical care response. This article reviews the existing state of emergency preparedness for mass critical illness and presents an analysis of limitations to support the suggestions of the Task Force on Mass Casualty Critical Care, which are presented in subsequent articles. Baseline shortages of specialized resources such as critical care staff, medical supplies, and treatment spaces are likely to limit the number of critically ill victims who can receive life-sustaining interventions. The deficiency in critical care surge capacity is exacerbated by lack of a sufficient framework to integrate critical care within the overall institutional response and coordination of critical care across local institutions and broader geographic areas.
在二十世纪,大规模伤亡事件很少会产生成百上千需要确定性重症监护的危重病患者。然而,未来的灾难性自然灾害、流行病或大流行、核装置爆炸或大规模化学物质暴露可能会改变常见的灾害流行病学,并需要大规模的重症监护应对措施。本文回顾了针对大规模危重病的应急准备现状,并分析了局限性,以支持大规模伤亡重症监护特别工作组的建议,这些建议将在后续文章中呈现。诸如重症监护人员、医疗用品和治疗空间等专业资源的基线短缺可能会限制能够接受维持生命干预措施的危重伤者数量。重症监护应急能力的不足因缺乏一个将重症监护纳入整体机构应对措施的充分框架以及跨地方机构和更广泛地理区域的重症监护协调而加剧。