Blair M W, Giraldo M C, Buendía H F, Tovar E, Duque M C, Beebe S E
CIAT - International Center for Tropical Agriculture, 1380 N.W. 78th Ave., Miami, FL 33126, USA.
Theor Appl Genet. 2006 Jun;113(1):100-9. doi: 10.1007/s00122-006-0276-4. Epub 2006 Apr 14.
A diversity survey was used to estimate allelic diversity and heterozygosity of 129 microsatellite markers in a panel of 44 common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes that have been used as parents of mapping populations. Two types of microsatellites were evaluated, based respectively on gene coding and genomic sequences. Genetic diversity was evaluated by estimating the polymorphism information content (PIC), as well as the distribution and range of alleles sizes. Gene-based microsatellites proved to be less polymorphic than genomic microsatellites in terms of both number of alleles (6.0 vs. 9.2) and PIC values (0.446 vs. 0.594) while greater size differences between the largest and the smallest allele were observed for the genomic microsatellites than for the gene-based microsatellites (31.4 vs. 19.1 bp). Markers that showed a high number of alleles were identified with a maximum of 28 alleles for the marker BMd1. The microsatellites were useful for distinguishing Andean and Mesoamerican genotypes, for uncovering the races within each genepool and for separating wild accessions from cultivars. Greater polymorphism and race structure was found within the Andean gene pool than within the Mesoamerican gene pool and polymorphism rate between genotypes was consistent with genepool and race identity. Comparisons between Andean genotypes had higher polymorphism (53.0%) on average than comparisons among Mesoamerican genotypes (33.4%). Within the Mesoamerican parental combinations, the intra-racial combinations between Mesoamerica and Durango or Jalisco race genotypes showed higher average rates of polymorphism (37.5%) than the within-race combinations between Mesoamerica race genotypes (31.7%). In multiple correspondance analysis we found two principal clusters of genotypes corresponding to the Mesoamerican and Andean gene pools and subgroups representing specific races especially for the Nueva Granada and Peru races of the Andean gene pool. Intra population diversity was higher within the Andean genepool than within the Mesoamerican genepool and this pattern was observed for both gene-based and genomic microsatellites. Furthermore, intra-population diversity within the Andean races (0.356 on average) was higher than within the Mesoamerican races (0.302). Within the Andean gene pool, race Peru had higher diversity compared to race Nueva Granada, while within the Mesoamerican gene pool, the races Durango, Guatemala and Jalisco had comparable levels of diversity which were below that of race Mesoamerica.
利用多样性调查来估计44个菜豆(Phaseolus vulgaris L.)基因型组成的群体中129个微卫星标记的等位基因多样性和杂合性,这些基因型已被用作作图群体的亲本。评估了两种类型的微卫星,分别基于基因编码序列和基因组序列。通过估计多态性信息含量(PIC)以及等位基因大小的分布和范围来评估遗传多样性。在等位基因数量(6.0对9.2)和PIC值(0.446对0.594)方面,基于基因的微卫星的多态性均低于基因组微卫星,同时基因组微卫星的最大和最小等位基因之间的大小差异比基于基因的微卫星更大(31.4对19.1 bp)。鉴定出了一些具有大量等位基因的标记,标记BMd1的等位基因最多有28个。这些微卫星有助于区分安第斯和中美洲基因型,揭示每个基因库中的族,并将野生种质与栽培品种区分开来。安第斯基因库中的多态性和族结构比中美洲基因库中的更大,基因型之间的多态性率与基因库和族的一致性相符。安第斯基因型之间的比较平均多态性(53.0%)高于中美洲基因型之间的比较(33.4%)。在中美洲亲本组合中,中美洲与杜兰戈或哈利斯科族基因型之间的种族内组合的平均多态性率(37.5%)高于中美洲种族基因型之间的种族内组合(31.7%)。在多重对应分析中,我们发现了两个主要的基因型聚类,分别对应中美洲和安第斯基因库,以及代表特定族的亚组,特别是安第斯基因库的新格拉纳达和秘鲁族。安第斯基因库内的群体内多样性高于中美洲基因库内的群体内多样性,基于基因和基因组的微卫星均观察到这种模式。此外,安第斯族内的群体内多样性(平均0.356)高于中美洲族内的群体内多样性(0.302)。在安第斯基因库中,秘鲁族的多样性高于新格拉纳达族,而在中美洲基因库中,杜兰戈、危地马拉和哈利斯科族的多样性水平相当,均低于中美洲族。