• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中文数字命名系统具有透明度吗?来自中英双语儿童的证据。

Is the Chinese number-naming system transparent? Evidence from Chinese-English bilingual children.

作者信息

Rasmussen Carmen, Ho Elaine, Nicoladis Elena, Leung Joyce, Bisanz Jeffrey

机构信息

Centre for Research in Child Development, University of Alberta.

出版信息

Can J Exp Psychol. 2006 Mar;60(1):60-7. doi: 10.1037/cjep2006007.

DOI:10.1037/cjep2006007
PMID:16615718
Abstract

Chinese-speaking children have been shown to have an advantage over English-speaking children in a variety of mathematical areas, including counting. One possible explanation for the advantage in counting is that the Chinese number-naming system is relatively transparent, compared to English, in that number names typically are directly indicative of base-10 structure (e.g., 12 is named "ten-two" rather than "twelve"). To determine whether the transparency of the Chinese number-naming system influences counting in bilingual children, we tested 25 Chinese-English bilingual children between the ages of 3 and 5 years, both in English and in Chinese. Children were asked to count as high as they could (abstract counting) and also to count objects in small, medium, and large arrays (object counting). No evidence was found for transparency or for transfer from one language to the other. Instead, relative proficiency in the two languages influenced counting skill. These results are discussed in terms of linguistic and cultural variables that might account for cross-linguistic differences in counting.

摘要

研究表明,说中文的儿童在包括数数在内的各种数学领域比说英语的儿童更具优势。数数方面具有优势的一个可能解释是,与英语相比,中文数字命名系统相对透明,因为数字名称通常直接体现十进制结构(例如,12被命名为“十 二”,而不是“十二”)。为了确定中文数字命名系统的透明度是否会影响双语儿童的数数能力,我们对25名年龄在3至5岁之间的中英双语儿童进行了英语和中文测试。要求儿童尽可能多地数数(抽象数数),并对小、中、大阵列中的物体进行数数(实物数数)。未发现透明度或从一种语言到另一种语言的迁移的证据。相反,两种语言的相对熟练程度影响了数数技能。将根据可能解释数数方面跨语言差异的语言和文化变量来讨论这些结果。

相似文献

1
Is the Chinese number-naming system transparent? Evidence from Chinese-English bilingual children.中文数字命名系统具有透明度吗?来自中英双语儿童的证据。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2006 Mar;60(1):60-7. doi: 10.1037/cjep2006007.
2
Do children use language structure to discover the recursive rules of counting?儿童是否会运用语言结构来发现计数的递归规则?
Cogn Psychol. 2020 Mar;117:101263. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.101263. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
3
Transparent number-naming system gives only limited advantage for preschooler's numerical development: Comparisons of Vietnamese and French-speaking children.透明数字命名系统对学龄前儿童的数字发展仅有有限优势:对比越南语和法语儿童。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 7;15(12):e0243472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243472. eCollection 2020.
4
The Bilingual Switching Advantage: Sometimes Related to Bilingual Proficiency, Sometimes Not.双语转换优势:有时与双语能力有关,有时则无关。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2015 Aug;21(7):531-44. doi: 10.1017/S1355617715000521.
5
Linguistic influence on mathematical development is specific rather than pervasive: revisiting the Chinese Number Advantage in Chinese and English children.语言对数学发展的影响具有特定性而非普遍性:重新审视中国儿童在中英文环境下的数字优势。
Front Psychol. 2015 Feb 26;6:203. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00203. eCollection 2015.
6
A cross-linguistic study of early word meaning: universal ontology and linguistic influence.早期词义的跨语言研究:普遍本体论与语言影响
Cognition. 1997 Feb;62(2):169-200. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(96)00784-6.
7
Multilingual English-Mandarin-Malay phonological error patterns: An initial cross-sectional study of 2 to 4 years old Malaysian Chinese children.多语言英语-普通话-马来语语音错误模式:对2至4岁马来西亚华裔儿童的初步横断面研究。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2018;32(10):889-912. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2018.1459852. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
8
Phonological skills in predominantly English-speaking, predominantly Spanish-speaking, and Spanish-English bilingual children.以英语为主、以西班牙语为主以及西班牙语-英语双语儿童的语音技能。
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2005 Jul;36(3):201-18. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2005/021).
9
A robust demonstration of the cognate facilitation effect in first-language and second-language naming.在第一语言和第二语言命名中同源促进效应的有力证明。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Jan;141:229-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.09.007. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
10
Ordinal knowledge: number names and number concepts in Chinese and English.序数知识:中英文中的数字名称和数字概念
Can J Exp Psychol. 2000 Jun;54(2):129-40. doi: 10.1037/h0087335.

引用本文的文献

1
Deafness and early language deprivation influence arithmetic performances.耳聋和早期语言剥夺会影响算术能力。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Nov 30;16:1000598. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.1000598. eCollection 2022.
2
Transparent number-naming system gives only limited advantage for preschooler's numerical development: Comparisons of Vietnamese and French-speaking children.透明数字命名系统对学龄前儿童的数字发展仅有有限优势:对比越南语和法语儿童。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 7;15(12):e0243472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243472. eCollection 2020.
3
Children's Non-symbolic, Symbolic Addition and Their Mapping Capacity at 4-7 Years Old.
4至7岁儿童的非符号、符号加法及其映射能力。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 17;8:1203. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01203. eCollection 2017.
4
Linguistic influence on mathematical development is specific rather than pervasive: revisiting the Chinese Number Advantage in Chinese and English children.语言对数学发展的影响具有特定性而非普遍性:重新审视中国儿童在中英文环境下的数字优势。
Front Psychol. 2015 Feb 26;6:203. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00203. eCollection 2015.
5
The Cognitive Development of Young Dual Language Learners: A Critical Review.幼儿双语学习者的认知发展:批判性综述
Early Child Res Q. 2014;29(4):699-714. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.02.003.