• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在血管外科实践中实现美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会二级预防目标:一个不容错过的机遇。

Meeting AHA/ACC secondary prevention goals in a vascular surgery practice: an opportunity we cannot afford to miss.

作者信息

Kinikini Daniel, Sarfati Mark R, Mueller Michelle T, Kraiss Larry W

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City 84132-2301, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2006 Apr;43(4):781-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.12.002.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2005.12.002
PMID:16616237
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In an effort to reduce cardiovascular mortality, patients with atherosclerotic arterial disease should undergo risk factor modification according to the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) Secondary Prevention Guidelines (hereafter, Guideline). We assessed compliance with the Guideline in a group of patients seen in a vascular surgery practice.

METHODS

We evaluated 200 consecutive patients with lower-extremity occlusive disease, cerebrovascular disease, or abdominal aortic aneurysm seen by a university-based vascular surgery practice. The subjects were patients who had been seen previously in our clinic (ESTABLISHED) and new referrals (NEW). Data pertinent to each of the nine AHA/ACC Guideline goals were collected from patient interviews, medication histories, and laboratory records. Compliance with each of the Guideline goals was evaluated. Differences in compliance between ESTABLISHED and NEW patient groups were also compared. We also recorded whether a patient had a previous endovascular or open surgical vascular intervention (EVENT or NO EVENT). Differences in compliance between the EVENT and NO EVENT groups were compared.

RESULTS

Most patients did not achieve the secondary prevention goals recommended in the Guideline. Patients who had a prior vascular intervention (EVENT) were significantly more likely to achieve goals for low-density lipoprotein level (43% vs 23%), and for statin (71% vs 39%), beta-blocker (46% vs 27%), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (53% vs. 35%), and antiplatelet agent (85% vs. 68%) use (P < .05). ESTABLISHED patients were significantly more likely than NEW patients to have a prior EVENT (87% vs 47%, P < .0005). ESTABLISHED patients were significantly more likely than NEW patients to achieve goals for low-density lipoprotein level, beta-blocker, and statin use; however, these differences were likely due to the higher proportion of EVENT patients in the ESTABLISHED group.

CONCLUSION

Compliance with the Guideline is suboptimal in patients with atherosclerotic arterial disease. Secondary prevention goals were more often achieved in the EVENT patient group, suggesting that a vascular intervention may lead to increased patient and physician awareness and compliance with the Guideline. A targeted effort towards risk factor modification in patients with atherosclerotic arterial disease could improve compliance with the Guideline and reduce cardiovascular mortality.

摘要

目的

为降低心血管疾病死亡率,患有动脉粥样硬化性疾病的患者应根据美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会(AHA/ACC)二级预防指南(以下简称指南)进行危险因素修正。我们评估了一组血管外科门诊患者对该指南的依从性。

方法

我们评估了一所大学血管外科门诊连续收治的200例下肢闭塞性疾病、脑血管疾病或腹主动脉瘤患者。研究对象包括曾在我们诊所就诊过的患者(已就诊患者)和新转诊患者(新患者)。通过患者访谈、用药史和实验室记录收集与AHA/ACC指南九个目标相关的数据。评估对每个指南目标的依从性。同时比较已就诊患者组和新患者组在依从性上的差异。我们还记录了患者既往是否接受过血管腔内或开放性血管手术干预(有事件或无事件)。比较有事件组和无事件组在依从性上的差异。

结果

大多数患者未达到指南中推荐的二级预防目标。既往有血管干预(有事件)的患者更有可能达到低密度脂蛋白水平(43%对23%)、他汀类药物(71%对39%)、β受体阻滞剂(46%对27%)、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(53%对35%)以及抗血小板药物使用(85%对68%)的目标(P <.05)。已就诊患者比新患者更有可能有既往有事件(87%对47%,P <.0005)。已就诊患者比新患者更有可能达到低密度脂蛋白水平、β受体阻滞剂和他汀类药物使用的目标;然而,这些差异可能是由于已就诊患者组中有事件患者的比例较高。

结论

动脉粥样硬化性疾病患者对指南的依从性欠佳。有事件患者组更常达到二级预防目标,这表明血管干预可能会提高患者和医生对指南的认识及依从性。针对动脉粥样硬化性疾病患者进行有针对性的危险因素修正工作,可能会提高对指南的依从性并降低心血管疾病死亡率。

相似文献

1
Meeting AHA/ACC secondary prevention goals in a vascular surgery practice: an opportunity we cannot afford to miss.在血管外科实践中实现美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会二级预防目标:一个不容错过的机遇。
J Vasc Surg. 2006 Apr;43(4):781-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.12.002.
2
Pharmacologic risk factor treatment of peripheral arterial disease is lacking and requires vascular surgeon participation.外周动脉疾病的药物风险因素治疗尚不完善,需要血管外科医生的参与。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2007 Mar;21(2):163-6. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2007.01.008.
3
Regional and practice variation in adherence to guideline recommendations for secondary and primary prevention among outpatients with atherothrombosis or risk factors in the United States: a report from the REACH Registry.美国动脉粥样硬化血栓形成或有风险因素的门诊患者二级和一级预防指南建议依从性的地区及实践差异:来自REACH注册研究的报告
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2009 Sep;8(3):104-11. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e3181b8395d.
4
Uninsured South Florida vascular surgery patients are less likely to receive optimal medical management than their insured counterparts.未参保的南佛罗里达州血管外科患者接受最佳医疗管理的可能性低于其参保患者。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Apr;51(4 Suppl):4S-8S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.01.035.
5
Reduction of in-hospital mortality among California hospitals meeting Leapfrog evidence-based standards for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.加利福尼亚州符合腹主动脉瘤修复循证标准的医院,其院内死亡率降低。
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Jun;47(6):1155-6; discussion 1163-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.01.021.
6
Guidelines for cardiac management in noncardiac surgery are poorly implemented in clinical practice: results from a peripheral vascular survey in the Netherlands.非心脏手术心脏管理指南在临床实践中执行不力:荷兰一项外周血管调查结果
Anesthesiology. 2007 Oct;107(4):537-44. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000281892.15637.fb.
7
[Impact of the acute myocardial infarction guidelines on in-hospital managements and outcome of the patients in China].[急性心肌梗死指南对中国患者住院管理及预后的影响]
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2010 Nov;22(11):649-55.
8
Knowledge of secondary prevention guidelines for coronary heart disease: results from a physicians' survey in China.冠心病二级预防指南知晓情况:中国医生调查结果。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012 Oct;19(5):991-8. doi: 10.1177/1741826711421299. Epub 2011 Aug 22.
9
Clinician agreement with perioperative cardiovascular evaluation guidelines and clinical outcomes.临床医生对围手术期心血管评估指南的认同与临床结局
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Jan 1;97(1):118-22. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.07.115. Epub 2005 Nov 15.
10
Patients undergoing infrainguinal bypass to treat atherosclerotic vascular disease are underprescribed cardioprotective medications: effect on graft patency, limb salvage, and mortality.接受下肢旁路手术治疗动脉粥样硬化性血管疾病的患者,其心脏保护药物的处方不足:对移植物通畅率、肢体挽救率和死亡率的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2004 Feb;39(2):357-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2003.08.030.

引用本文的文献

1
Four Statin Benefit Groups Defined by The 2013 ACC/AHA New Cholesterol Guideline are Characterized by Increased Plasma Level of Electronegative Low-Density Lipoprotein.2013年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会新胆固醇指南定义的四个他汀类药物受益组的特征是血浆中带负电荷的低密度脂蛋白水平升高。
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2016 Nov;32(6):667-675. doi: 10.6515/acs20151228e.
2
Balancing Model Performance and Simplicity to Predict Postoperative Primary Care Blood Pressure Elevation.平衡模型性能与简易性以预测术后初级保健血压升高
Anesth Analg. 2015 Sep;121(3):632-641. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000860.
3
Preoperative depression symptom severity and its impact on adherence to preoperative beta-blocker therapy.
术前抑郁症状的严重程度及其对术前β受体阻滞剂治疗依从性的影响。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2014 Dec;28(6):1467-73. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2014.05.006. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
4
Suboptimal use of risk reduction therapy in peripheral arterial disease patients at a major teaching hospital.一家大型教学医院外周动脉疾病患者中风险降低疗法的使用未达最佳水平。
Ann Saudi Med. 2011 Jul-Aug;31(4):371-5. doi: 10.4103/0256-4947.83219.