Suppr超能文献

农场农药施用者非持久性农药暴露的自我报告与生物监测

Nonpersistent pesticide exposure self-report versus biomonitoring in farm pesticide applicators.

作者信息

Perry Melissa J, Marbella Anne, Layde Peter M

机构信息

Occupational Health Program, Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

Ann Epidemiol. 2006 Sep;16(9):701-7. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2005.12.004. Epub 2006 Apr 17.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Few studies using biologic markers to examine nonpersistent pesticide exposure among pesticide applicators were conducted in field settings. This study compares self-reported dermal, inhalation, and ingestion exposures with urinalysis results after one-time application of the commonly used herbicide atrazine to field crops. It was hypothesized that: i) applicator reports of exposure would be associated positively with detection of urinary atrazine metabolites, and ii) applicator reports of personal-protective-equipment (PPE) use would be associated negatively with detection of urinary atrazine metabolites.

METHODS

Wisconsin dairy farmers were randomly selected to participate in 1997 to 1998 and were instructed to collect a urine sample 8 hours after the first pesticide application of the season. Farmers then were interviewed within 1 week of their first application to report on application practices. Eighty-six urine samples were analyzed for deethylatrazine, a major atrazine metabolite.

RESULTS

Comparing urinalysis results with self-reported dermal, inhalation, and ingestion exposure showed poor agreement between self-reported exposure and urinary deethylatrazine detections (all kappa < 0.40). Multivariate linear regression modeling with deethylatrazine level as the outcome showed that self-reported practices did not significantly predict atrazine metabolite levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Possible explanations for the discrepancies between urinalysis results and self-reported data include: i) inaccuracies in self-reported data and ii) substantial interpersonal variation in atrazine metabolism, resulting in major differences in body burden for similar exposures. Either explanation poses challenges for epidemiologic studies of the health effects of pesticides, which rely solely on self-reported measures of exposure. Additional evaluation of determinants of accuracy in self-assessed occupational and environmental exposures is needed.

摘要

目的

在田间环境中,很少有研究使用生物标志物来检测农药施用者接触非持久性农药的情况。本研究比较了在向大田作物一次性施用常用除草剂阿特拉津后,自我报告的皮肤、吸入和摄入接触情况与尿液分析结果。研究假设如下:i)施用者报告的接触情况与尿中阿特拉津代谢物的检测呈正相关,ii)施用者报告的个人防护设备(PPE)使用情况与尿中阿特拉津代谢物的检测呈负相关。

方法

随机选择威斯康星州的奶农在1997年至1998年参与研究,并指示他们在本季首次施用农药8小时后采集尿液样本。然后在他们首次施用农药后的1周内对奶农进行访谈,以报告施用情况。对86份尿液样本进行了主要阿特拉津代谢物脱乙基阿特拉津的分析。

结果

将尿液分析结果与自我报告的皮肤、吸入和摄入接触情况进行比较,发现自我报告的接触情况与尿中脱乙基阿特拉津的检测结果之间一致性较差(所有kappa值均<0.40)。以脱乙基阿特拉津水平为结果的多变量线性回归模型显示,自我报告的施用情况并不能显著预测阿特拉津代谢物水平。

结论

尿液分析结果与自我报告数据之间存在差异的可能原因包括:i)自我报告数据不准确,ii)阿特拉津代谢存在较大的个体差异,导致类似接触情况下体内负荷存在重大差异。这两种解释都给仅依赖自我报告接触量度的农药健康影响流行病学研究带来了挑战。需要对自我评估的职业和环境接触准确性的决定因素进行进一步评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验