Bird Geoffrey, Catmur Caroline, Silani Giorgia, Frith Chris, Frith Uta
Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, UK.
Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 15;31(4):1614-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.037. Epub 2006 Apr 17.
We investigated whether individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) would show attentional modulation for social (face) and non-social (house) stimuli. Sixteen individuals with ASD and 16 matched control participants completed a task in which pairs of face and house stimuli were present on every trial, with one of the pairs randomly assigned to attended locations and the other to unattended locations. Both mass-univariate (SPM) and region of interest analyses suggested that responses to houses were modulated by attention in both groups, but that only the control participants demonstrated attentional modulation of face-selective regions. Thus, the participants with ASD demonstrated a lack of attentional modulation which was particularly evident for the social stimulus. Analyses of effective connectivity indicated that these results were due to a failure of attention to modulate connectivity between extrastriate areas and V1. We discuss how these results may suggest a mechanism to explain the reduced salience of social stimuli in ASD.
我们研究了自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)个体是否会对社交(面部)和非社交(房屋)刺激表现出注意力调节。16名患有ASD的个体和16名匹配的对照参与者完成了一项任务,在每次试验中都呈现面部和房屋刺激对,其中一对被随机分配到被关注的位置,另一对被分配到未被关注的位置。大规模单变量(SPM)分析和感兴趣区域分析均表明,两组对房屋的反应都受到注意力的调节,但只有对照参与者表现出对面部选择性区域的注意力调节。因此,患有ASD的参与者表现出注意力调节缺失,这在社交刺激中尤为明显。有效连接性分析表明,这些结果是由于注意力未能调节纹外区域与V1之间的连接性。我们讨论了这些结果如何可能暗示一种机制来解释ASD中社交刺激显著性降低的现象。