Robbe-Austerman Suelee, Stabel Judith R, Palmer Mitchell V
Bacterial Diseases of Livestock Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Ames, IA 50010, USA.
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2006 Mar;18(2):189-94. doi: 10.1177/104063870601800208.
The aim of the study reported here was to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of the gamma interferon (IFN-gamma) ELISA for paratuberculosis in sheep using receiver-operating characteristic analysis. Bacteriologic culture of tissues was used to define the reference positive population (n = 33). Two reference negative populations were used: culture-negative sheep from infected flocks (n = 77), and sheep from noninfected flocks (n = 358). We also evaluated the accuracy of 2 Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis (MAP) antigen preparations, a whole-cell sonicate (MpS) and a johnin purified-protein derivative (PPDj). The source of the reference negative sheep used in the analysis affected overall accuracy of the IFN-gamma ELISA. The area under the curve was 0.683 (95% confidence interval 0.574-0.787), using culture-negative sheep from infected flocks, was 0.831 (0.764-0.889), using sheep from noninfected flocks for the MpS, and was 0.809 (0.726-0.881) and 0.897 (0.862-0.925) for the PPDj, respectively. Using the MpS, the cut point that classified the most sheep correctly was an optical density reading of 0.20, for sensitivity of 40.7% (19.4-57.6) and specificity of 88.7% (77.0-95.7) or 97.6% (93.04-99.5), depending on the reference negative population used. Using the PPDj, the cut point that classified the most sheep correctly was 0.25 for sensitivity of 66.7% (47.2-82.7) and specificity of 93.5% (85.5-97.9) or 98.3% (96.4-99.4), respectively. The PPDj was more accurate at identifying MAP-infected sheep than was the MpS (P = 0.034).
本研究的目的是通过受试者工作特征分析,评估γ干扰素(IFN-γ)酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)检测绵羊副结核病的敏感性和特异性。采用组织细菌培养来确定参考阳性群体(n = 33)。使用了两个参考阴性群体:来自感染羊群的培养阴性绵羊(n = 77),以及来自未感染羊群的绵羊(n = 358)。我们还评估了两种副结核分枝杆菌(MAP)抗原制剂的准确性,一种是全细胞超声裂解物(MpS),另一种是副结核菌素纯化蛋白衍生物(PPDj)。分析中使用的参考阴性绵羊的来源影响了IFN-γ ELISA的总体准确性。对于MpS,使用来自感染羊群的培养阴性绵羊时,曲线下面积为0.683(95%置信区间0.574 - 0.787),使用来自未感染羊群的绵羊时,曲线下面积为0.831(0.764 - 0.889);对于PPDj,曲线下面积分别为0.809(0.726 - 0.881)和0.897(0.862 - 0.925)。使用MpS时,能正确分类最多绵羊的临界点是光密度读数为0.20,敏感性为40.7%(19.4 - 57.6),特异性为88.7%(77.0 - 95.7)或97.6%(93.04 - 99.5),具体取决于所使用的参考阴性群体。使用PPDj时,能正确分类最多绵羊的临界点是0.25,敏感性为66.7%(47.2 - 82.7),特异性分别为93.5%(85.5 - 97.9)或98.3%(96.4 - 99.4)。PPDj在识别MAP感染绵羊方面比MpS更准确(P = 0.034)。